- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,371
- Liked Posts:
- 3,643
While Eddy P goes onto to become the next Justin Tucker.He's going to knock in about 70% of his kicks now......
While Eddy P goes onto to become the next Justin Tucker.He's going to knock in about 70% of his kicks now......
Didn’t we cut Gould over this kind of money?
Santos was actually accurate.
Not, the ball wobbled a lot but still made it thru accurate. Actually accurate.
Hopefully it continues.
Wanny bet?
Gould was making an extra million on a significantly worse team
Bears were in the wild card game 3 years after cutting him. Sure could have used him if I recall.
Games | 0-19 | 20-29 | 30-39 | 40-49 | 50+ | Scoring | Scoring | Kickoffs | Punting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Age | Tm | Pos | No. | G | GS | FGA | FGM | FGA | FGM | FGA | FGM | FGA | FGM | FGA | FGM | FGA | FGM | Lng | FG% | XPA | XPM | XP% | KO | KOYds | TB | TB% | KOAvg | Pnt | Yds | Lng | Blck | Y/P | AV |
2014 | 23 | KAN | 5 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 25 | 53 | 83.3% | 38 | 38 | 100.0% | 80 | 5085 | 26 | 32.5% | 63.6 | 3 | ||||||
2015 | 24 | KAN | 5 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 37 | 30 | 53 | 81.1% | 41 | 39 | 95.1% | 90 | 5721 | 40 | 44.4% | 63.6 | 3 | ||||||||
2016 | 25 | KAN | 5 | 16 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 31 | 53 | 88.6% | 39 | 36 | 92.3% | 86 | 5355 | 48 | 55.8% | 62.3 | 3 | ||||||||
2017 | 26 | 2TM | 5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 39 | 80.0% | 14 | 14 | 100.0% | 20 | 1308 | 12 | 60.0% | 65.4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
CHI | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 2 | 130 | 2 | 100.0% | 65.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
KAN | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 12 | 12 | 100.0% | 18 | 1178 | 10 | 55.6% | 65.4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
2018 | 27 | 2TM | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 14 | 45 | 77.8% | 23 | 22 | 95.7% | 49 | 2977 | 19 | 38.8% | 60.8 | 1 | ||||||||
LAR | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 13 | 821 | 7 | 53.8% | 63.2 | 0 | ||||||||||||
TAM | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 75.0% | 17 | 17 | 100.0% | 36 | 2156 | 12 | 33.3% | 59.9 | 1 | ||||||||||||
2019 | 28 | TEN | 7 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 53 | 44.4% | 12 | 12 | 100.0% | 21 | 1339 | 12 | 57.1% | 63.8 | 0 | ||||||||||
2020 | 29 | CHI | k | 2 | 16 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 32 | 30 | 55 | 93.8% | 37 | 36 | 97.3% | 86 | 5252 | 42 | 48.8% | 61.1 | 5 | |||||||
Career | 83 | 2 | 2 | 40 | 38 | 56 | 51 | 48 | 37 | 20 | 10 | 166 | 138 | 55 | 83.1% | 204 | 197 | 96.6% | 432 | 27037 | 199 | 46.1% | 62.6 | 16 | ||||||||||
4 yrs | KAN | 51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 25 | 36 | 33 | 29 | 23 | 12 | 7 | 105 | 89 | 53 | 84.8% | 130 | 125 | 96.2% | 274 | 17339 | 124 | 45.3% | 63.3 | 10 | ||||||||
2 yrs | CHI | 18 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 34 | 31 | 55 | 91.2% | 39 | 38 | 97.4% | 88 | 5382 | 44 | 50.0% | 61.2 | 5 | ||||||||||
1 yr | LAR | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 39 | 83.3% | 6 | 5 | 83.3% | 13 | 821 | 7 | 53.8% | 63.2 | 0 | |||||||||||
1 yr | TAM | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 45 | 75.0% | 17 | 17 | 100.0% | 36 | 2156 | 12 | 33.3% | 59.9 | 1 | |||||||||||
1 yr | TEN | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 53 | 44.4% | 12 | 12 | 100.0% | 21 | 1339 | 12 | 57.1% | 63.8 | 0 |
Not really. Hes been extremely good when healthy. Poor play has actually been the outlier for himI know it's nice to have the kicker position locked down, but with it being such a mentally finicky position is anyone worried about how many times he's been cut from an NFL team? I mean, his 2020 season with the Bears looks more like the anomaly than what to expect:
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS FGA FGM FGA FGM FGA FGM FGA FGM FGA FGM FGA FGM Lng FG% XPA XPM XP% KO KOYds TB TB% KOAvg Pnt Yds Lng Blck Y/P AV
Games0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50+ Scoring Scoring Kickoffs Punting 2014 23 KAN 5 16 0 1 1 10 10 6 5 11 8 2 1 30 25 53 83.3% 38 38 100.0% 80 5085 26 32.5% 63.6 3 2015 24 KAN 5 16 0 8 7 10 10 11 9 8 4 37 30 53 81.1% 41 39 95.1% 90 5721 40 44.4% 63.6 3 2016 25 KAN 5 16 0 9 8 17 15 7 6 2 2 35 31 53 88.6% 39 36 92.3% 86 5355 48 55.8% 62.3 3 2017 26 2TM 5 0 4 4 1 5 4 39 80.0% 14 14 100.0% 20 1308 12 60.0% 65.4 1 CHI 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0% 2 130 2 100.0% 65.0 0 KAN 5 3 0 3 3 3 3 100.0% 12 12 100.0% 18 1178 10 55.6% 65.4 1 2018 27 2TM 9 0 1 1 4 4 6 6 6 3 1 18 14 45 77.8% 23 22 95.7% 49 2977 19 38.8% 60.8 1 LAR 3 2 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 6 5 83.3% 6 5 83.3% 13 821 7 53.8% 63.2 0 TAM 5 7 0 2 2 4 4 5 3 1 12 9 75.0% 17 17 100.0% 36 2156 12 33.3% 59.9 1 2019 28 TEN 7 5 0 3 1 3 2 3 1 9 4 53 44.4% 12 12 100.0% 21 1339 12 57.1% 63.8 0 2020 29 CHI k 2 16 0 9 9 10 10 10 9 3 2 32 30 55 93.8% 37 36 97.3% 86 5252 42 48.8% 61.1 5 Career 83 2 2 40 38 56 51 48 37 20 10 166 138 55 83.1% 204 197 96.6% 432 27037 199 46.1% 62.6 16 4 yrs KAN 51 0 1 1 27 25 36 33 29 23 12 7 105 89 53 84.8% 130 125 96.2% 274 17339 124 45.3% 63.3 10 2 yrs CHI 18 0 9 9 11 11 10 9 4 2 34 31 55 91.2% 39 38 97.4% 88 5382 44 50.0% 61.2 5 1 yr LAR 2 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 6 5 39 83.3% 6 5 83.3% 13 821 7 53.8% 63.2 0 1 yr TAM 7 0 2 2 4 4 5 3 1 12 9 45 75.0% 17 17 100.0% 36 2156 12 33.3% 59.9 1 1 yr TEN 5 0 3 1 3 2 3 1 9 4 53 44.4% 12 12 100.0% 21 1339 12 57.1% 63.8 0
love Gould but to be completely fair, and i dont remember how much money he was making, but he was trending downward.Didn’t we cut Gould over this kind of money?
That may be the case, but then doesn't it mean his history suggests he's injury prone?Most cuts have come after he was injured, that's the big thing, if he stays healthy he will be good