- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 39,128
- Liked Posts:
- 52,132
I certainly slammed my laptop shut in frustration.Yawn
how many of Trubisky's wins came, compliments of the 2018 defense?
about 5 or 6 which puts him still slightly over 500,how many of Trubisky's wins came, compliments of the 2018 defense?
thanks, slightly over .500 is nothing worth boasting about, just a bit better than the other trash we've trotted out thereabout 5 or 6 which puts him still slightly over 500,
Looks like 8 of the 12 wins were more the defense winning the gameshow many of Trubisky's wins came, compliments of the 2018 defense?
#1 point D in 2018. #4 in 2019.about 5 or 6 which puts him still slightly over 500,
look at the wins in 2018 where Mitch played and look at the games he didnt play good in and its 5 or 6 games. One of the wins he put up a 113QB rating but only put up 1 TD and the total points was only 14 for the Bears so that one you could make the argument that the D should get more credit for the win. So if you want to credit the win to the D then its 6 games otherwise if you want to say that he had a good game because of the 113QB rating then it would be 5 games.. doesnt really change anything as far as him being slightly over 500#1 point D in 2018. #4 in 2019.
Id guess this is wrong.
Are you counting the buffalo game they scored 41 points in? Mitch was terrible in that game but d and ST were incrediblelook at the wins in 2018 where Mitch played and look at the games he didnt play good in and its 5 or 6 games. One of the wins he put up a 113QB rating but only put up 1 TD and the total points was only 14 for the Bears so that one you could make the argument that the D should get more credit for the win. So if you want to credit the win to the D then its 6 games otherwise if you want to say that he had a good game because of the 113QB rating then it would be 5 games.. doesnt really change anything as far as him being slightly over 500
You are trying real hard to give credit where it isn't due. First off, that stat isn't just for the year 2018 where it most conveniently fits your narrative. It includes 2017, 2019 and 2020. In 2018 the Bears led the league in takeaways and their offense had some of the best starting field position in the league. The easiest thing you can do is just go season game log by game log and see how many times they've scored 20 points or less. 20PPG ranks roughly in the low 20 to mid 20s, depending on the year. That is below league average. Are you willing to tell me that Mitch's offenses have only been carried by the D only 5-6 times over a 4 year span?look at the wins in 2018 where Mitch played and look at the games he didnt play good in and its 5 or 6 games. One of the wins he put up a 113QB rating but only put up 1 TD and the total points was only 14 for the Bears so that one you could make the argument that the D should get more credit for the win. So if you want to credit the win to the D then its 6 games otherwise if you want to say that he had a good game because of the 113QB rating then it would be 5 games.. doesnt really change anything as far as him being slightly over 500
no 135 yards and 1TD and 1INT is not a good game for Mitch that goes to the DAre you counting the buffalo game they scored 41 points in? Mitch was terrible in that game but d and ST were incredible
You are trying real hard to give credit where it isn't due. First off, that stat isn't just for the year 2018 where it most conveniently fits your narrative. It includes 2017, 2019 and 2020. In 2018 the Bears led the league in takeaways and their offense had some of the best starting field position in the league. The easiest thing you can do is just go season game log by game log and see how many times they've scored 20 points or less. 20PPG ranks roughly in the low 20 to mid 20s, depending on the year. That is below league average. Are you willing to tell me that Mitch's offenses have only been carried by the D only 5-6 times over a 4 year span?
sorry.I was replying to hyatt151 when he asked how many wins in 2018 was because of the D.. that why I was just talking about the 2018 year..