Depressing how much better Hurts is than Fields

Myk

85in25
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
11,115
Liked Posts:
4,459
#1 wide-outs can’t be covered in this leagues new rules.

We need a zebra and a Fox(Mooney) to go with a bunch of adequate #3’s that each have a situational specialty.

It amazes me how people can't comprehend the rule changes and want to stick with what hasn't worked since "flag, 56, flexing his muscles and pushing the QB".
When they pass a rule that someone can't make plays you no longer what those players. When they pass a rule that you can't stop that position from making plays that's what you want more of.
 

Midwaymonster75

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 3, 2013
Posts:
2,602
Liked Posts:
2,357
Actually it's depressing how much better every starting QB is compared to Fields. I have seen maybe 15 games this year and Fields has struggled more than anyone. Even Trubisky has not looked as bad.

Are the Bears just cursed?
I doubt you`ve seen 15 games this season and more importantly why should anyone give a shit about your dumbass opinion?
 

Aesopian

Hooters Waitress
Joined:
Jan 6, 2015
Posts:
16,276
Liked Posts:
9,228
Location:
Jupiter
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Hurts is impressive
 

Top