KingInTheNorth
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 6, 2017
- Posts:
- 845
- Liked Posts:
- 663
- Location:
- State College, Pennsylvania
I think that Foles is a pretty good QB. I also think he has no chance given his style of play to stay healthy an entire season, especially with our OL. The question is, would we rather see Nick early and Trubisky later, or the inverse. I can honestly talk myself into either position pretty easily. Pros and cons with both.
Interesting. Trubisky never had a decent TE on his team. Burton looked like a star after being a backup. What would a real TE look like.Nick Foles like to throw to TEs in an RPO. Coincidence we invested there?
I am hoping the TE room is gonna stop us from being What ?
29th in 3 and outs ?
29th in yards per play ?
29th in most punts ?
( I read somewhere that in all those above categories we might not be Exactly 29th, but, are damn near pretty close to that )
Foles 1st for me. If Mitch starts and is pulled, he's likely done unless it's by injury. Mitch watching gives him an example to follow for prep and running the O correctly and maybe the next time we see him he'll have better acclimated to the pro game. The 'he needs snaps' argument has now past. He needs and has always needed to better understand and conceptualize his play.I think that Foles is a pretty good QB. I also think he has no chance given his style of play to stay healthy an entire season, especially with our OL. The question is, would we rather see Nick early and Trubisky later, or the inverse. I can honestly talk myself into either position pretty easily. Pros and cons with both.
TRUE!!!! Wentz will soon be popping up on the "most overrated" listsThe love for Carson Wentz and praise of Carson Wentz so far outweigh his actual accomplishments it's ridiculous.
His record against winning teams is Stafford-level, isn't it?
I agree that both Bennetts are asses who like to stir the pot. Their opinion of themselves is off the charts unrealistic.Okay, let me chime in.
It's hard to get behind Bennett and his comments. He played with the team for only one season where Wentz was coming back from tearing his ACL, LCL and partially tearing the IT band in week 14 whereas Nick Foles was coming off being the Superbowl MVP.
You are comparing one player at the height of their career to another at the lowest point.
I'd add, Michael Bennett likes to stir the pot. He and his brother, who you Bears fans know a bit about, just are outspoken dudes who seem to like going against the grain.
Look at what Wentz did as a rookie, his MVP caliber 2nd season or last season while missing his tope 3 WRs you can see his talent and what kind of leader he is.
The final point, which is by far the most important, anyone's thoughts on Wentz have no barring on how Foles does as a Bear. They are two completely separate issues.
Foles 1st for me. If Mitch starts and is pulled, he's likely done unless it's by injury. Mitch watching gives him an example to follow for prep and running the O correctly and maybe the next time we see him he'll have better acclimated to the pro game. The 'he needs snaps' argument has now past. He needs and has always needed to better understand and conceptualize his play.
We all assume that Foles goes down if he starts and it makes sense since he's never played 16 games but imagine if he starts, plays well and stays healthy. Sure would make the Mitch's contract situation an odd one at years end. In that scenario, I'd like to keep him unless offered silly money elsewhere.
Another new aspect of this duo is that if Mitch goes down for dinged shoulder or ankle etc, does he get his job back or return as quickly as previous years. It will certainly be an interesting dynamic. At least both him and Foles seem like good guys and be team players in any scenario.
Don't care to dance with you and your boorish pointy stick, even if you're holding the wrong end.If Foles is starting week one he will have 2 TEs that Mitch never had. If Foles runs away with this why would Mitch see the field outside of injury,
I've been watching Eagles football for a very long time and I respectfully disagree. He's the best QB the Eagles have had. He's better than McNabb, Vick, Cunningham, Jaws, etc...I agree that both Bennetts are asses who like to stir the pot. Their opinion of themselves is off the charts unrealistic.
I agree that it has no bearing on Foles as a Bear.
I don't dispute Wentz has talent. I am saying his actual production in the NFL is far short of his reputation. I don't think he's bad by any means. I just think 2/3 of a season with people thinking he was MVP got the ball rolling and he is talked about as one of the league's top QBs, but has nothing to show for it. 8-8 or 9-7 in a horrible division?
Yes, he lost WRs, but when other QBs play with horrible O Lines they don't get the pass Wentz seems to get.
He may be great in the future, but I think it's a real stretch to keep suggesting - as people do - that he has been great up to this point.
Don't care to go anywhere with you and your pointed stick, even if you're holding the wrong end.