How to win free agency? Don't play: SI article

policeman

Son of beech
Joined:
Aug 27, 2012
Posts:
1,975
Liked Posts:
1,683
Location:
Valhalla with Crom!!
Nice article by Peter King- the bit about the Ravens and their comp picks is interesting (inside the link). Here's the first few paragraphs to wet your beak

http://mmqb.si.com/2015/03/17/2015-nfl-free-agency-compensatory-picks/

How To Win Free Agency: Don’t Play

Think spending big will lead to winning big? Ask the 2011 Eagles—or any number of teams that dished out major dollars in recent years—how that worked out. And a look at one franchise that might have figured out how to make free agency work: Don't participate, and watch the draft picks roll in

In the summer of 2011, the NFL was just back from a player lockout, and the Philadelphia Eagles attacked free agency unlike any other team in the league. Though they’d made the playoffs two straight years, the Eagles viewed having cap room—while so many other teams were snug up against the league’s $120-million cap—as a chance to acquire top talent at Walmart prices.

Michael Vick was re-signed to a back-loaded five-year, $80 million deal to be the quarterback of the future—and Vince Young was imported to back him up. Ronnie Brown was signed to buttress the running game, and Steve Smith (the younger) got signed away from the rival Giants to be another receiving target for Vick. Pass-rusher Jason Babin was signed, as were Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie and Nnamdi Asomugha, forming what was seen as one of the best pass-coverage units in the league.

“The cap for the rest of us is $120 million,” one GM said to me on my trip to NFL training camps that summer. “It feels like it’s $220 million for them.”
As we all know, the spree was part of the Eagles’ downfall that led to Andy Reid’s firing and Chip Kelly’s hiring. More significantly for football, it showed that even the smart teams sometimes get seduced by the siren song of free agency. That’s what free agency is: a drug. It looks like a legitimate quick fix, but there are very few quick fixes in football. Who’d have thought Asomugha would tank, Vick would backslide significantly, and the Dream Team class (Vince Young’s words) would fail?

“As our experience shows,” former Eagles president Joe Banner said Monday, “there are lots of unknowns in free agency. They’re not your own players, and you don’t really know them the way you know your own guys. My advice now is, Proceed with caution. It’s a total crapshoot.”
JOE BANNER ON CHIP KELLY
Which bodes ill for this year’s wild spenders—the Jets, Eagles (again), Dolphins, Jaguars and Titans—as we reach the end of free agency’s first week. Hold onto your calculators. Each of those five teams, according to published contract figures, has committed more than $100 million to free agents. On average, those five teams have spent $134 million on new contracts for unrestricted players on the market.It’s an annual rite of spring—or of late winter: NFL teams trip all over themselves spending money on free agents. They do it even though, year after year, mounting evidence suggests (no, proves) that the free spending doesn’t result in more wins. It’s indisputable. With the exception of the occasional legitimate star player with good years left—Julius Peppers to Chicago in 2010, Peyton Manning to Denver in 2012, Mario Williams to Buffalo in 2012—going nuts in free agency has proved to be a negative in recent years.

This is not going to be a survey of every free-agent signing in the 22-year history of the system, since Reggie White took $17 million from Green Bay to leave Philadelphia in 1993. It’s more anecdotal. But the anecdotes shout.

 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
20,332
Liked Posts:
9,923
It is fine to sign players but you got to do it smart.

When Devon House is getting 6 million a year when he has basically been a backup CB, you know that is a mistake.
 

fatbeard

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2013
Posts:
13,173
Liked Posts:
12,172
Wait wait wait, you're saying it's not an optimal strategy to massively overpay for marginal talent like Ron Parker in a desperate attempt to fix every single hole in an offseason?
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
11,801
Liked Posts:
8,134
There is strength in numbers. As Jimmy Johnson used to say, having more draft picks is insurance against mistakes—because no matter how good a personnel man you are, you’re going to blow some picks.
That Jimmy Johnson seems to use the "throwing shit at a wall" method.

Seems he knows more the Ommy.
 

Pegger

President Stoopid
Joined:
Sep 18, 2012
Posts:
7,621
Liked Posts:
5,873
Location:
Communist Canada
Love how they referenced the Philidelphia 'Dream Team' as an example of what not to do. Such a horrible season that still leaves me shaking my head.

I think in the pre salary cap NFL era you could rely on your draft and the ability to develop players more. Currently GMs and coaches have a 2-3 year window to show improvement and if that doesn't happen they are shipped out.

I do agree that FAs are still unknowns. You don't know how they will fit from a culture stance or if their strengths in a different system will map over to what you do, but I'd counter that by saying they are less of an unknown than any draft pick. You have some tape of them against NFL competition to project what their strengths could be.

At the end of the day any new GM/coach is coming in because the team is falling short of expectations. If some of that failure is linked to the roster then it's up to them to make changes based on the opportunities available.
 

BearsFan51

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 13, 2013
Posts:
9,247
Liked Posts:
4,727
And yet the Packers were desperate to find a RB fix their offensive line and they're still looking for a complimentary pass rusher and secondary help.

If they had even a marginal secondary they'd probably have three rings for Rodgers by now. Instead they've become a predictable season storyline win the NFC North and go one and done in the playoffs.
 

Escobar's Army

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 14, 2013
Posts:
2,587
Liked Posts:
1,370
Stay out of FA unless there is a true difference maker available. Also they need to be young.
 

PolarBear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 8, 2013
Posts:
4,711
Liked Posts:
2,811
Good strategy really. Unless there is a truly elite player who is still in their prime, don't spend big.

Don't overpay player's who have good contract years, take the compensatory picks.
 

Run the ball

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
9,943
Liked Posts:
3,897
The key thing about receiving picks is letting go of decent players who sign big enough contracts. The Bears don't draft well enough to take advantage of this strategy.
 

r1terrell23

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
3,009
Liked Posts:
1,622
Seattle- Lynch, Harvin, Bennett, Avril, Graham

Broncos- Peyton, Welker, Sanders, Ware, Ward, Talib, Champ

Pats- Welker, Moss, Blount, Talib, Revis, McCourty, Ninkovich, Seau, Harrison

I don't think teams should just drop dough but I wont act like it can't help either. Look at our Bears

2001- Traylor, Big Ted, Miller

2006- Jones, Moose, Tait, Brown, Clark, Ogun,
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
57,904
Liked Posts:
37,876
It's not about FA or the draft. It's about making smart decisions no matter the path you take to build your team.
 

MurrDogg34

Active member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
234
Liked Posts:
167
Seattle- Lynch, Harvin, Bennett, Avril, Graham

Broncos- Peyton, Welker, Sanders, Ware, Ward, Talib, Champ

Pats- Welker, Moss, Blount, Talib, Revis, McCourty, Ninkovich, Seau, Harrison

I don't think teams should just drop dough but I wont act like it can't help either. Look at our Bears

2001- Traylor, Big Ted, Miller

2006- Jones, Moose, Tait, Brown, Clark, Ogun,

Ogun was a trade. Booker.
 

Warrior Spirit

The Truth
Donator
Joined:
Sep 12, 2010
Posts:
41,572
Liked Posts:
13,618
Ask the 2011 Eagles—or any number of teams that dished out major dollars in recent years—how that worked out.
I asked the Pats how it has worked out for them and they said "Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!!!"
 

Smokey Robinson

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
4,893
Liked Posts:
4,184
Location:
The 6ix
I don't think it is so black and white. Obviously overpaying for average players will get you in trouble but paying for players on the rise or true difference makers is needed. The Patriots proved last year you can spend big in FA and it will pay dividends provided the money is put into the right places.
 

The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2014
Posts:
18,007
Liked Posts:
1,682
Location:
Southern California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Somehow I think that Chip Kelly is way ahead of the rest of the league in his vision. I may be wrong.
 

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,816
Liked Posts:
35,721
We get it, draft well.

Too bad the Bears have been fucking terrible at the draft for about a decade.

Better suck for a decade and stockpile picks.
 

number51

Señor Member
Donator
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
16,904
Liked Posts:
11,721
Location:
Funk & Wagnalls' porch
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
So the Ravens are the model on how to win FA? Don't play. There are other teams always in the playoffs that do it different.


The real secret, get a QB. After that everything else magically falls into place. Unless you're Atlanta.
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,872
Liked Posts:
26,846
Stay out of FA unless there is a true difference maker available. Also they need to be young.

You got it backwards. Avoid young proven studs. You can only afford those when they come through the draft. Stay away from the Suh's unless its going to put your team over the top. A team's top talent has to come through the draft. Its the only way they will afford it.

You want to use FA to create depth and competition by targeting the middle tiers. And you hope you get one or 2 guys still developing that can go on to become a reliable starter. Think Tim Jennings when the Bears signed him from the Colts.
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,872
Liked Posts:
26,846
The reason teams have to build through the draft is because the salary cap. In order to retain veteran talent, a team has to have a significant portion of its roster on rookie contracts. Its especially important that you have a good proportion of starters on rookie contracts. This goes double for blue chip players. A team can only have 2-3 blue chip players on veteran contracts. It is essential that you are bringing in other top caliber players on rookie contracts. All cause the cap.
 

Top