PeterMbangala
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2015
- Posts:
- 2,747
- Liked Posts:
- 1,391
- Location:
- Te Anau, NZ
Setting aside the off the field stuff (i.e. the fact that he's a weird rapist scumbag).
He's, what, five years in to his NFL career. He is what he is at this point. Turnarounds like Tannehill are exceptionally rare.
I was thinking this morning about this from the defensive side of the ball. Obviously neither Trubisky or Winston are what you want, but...If the defense becomes a top 5 unit again, would they rather have someone like Mitch who doesn't turn it over much but regularly sits out the entire first half. Or would they rather have someone like Jameis who will make some throws but also throw a ton of picks (including some pick 6s)?
He's, what, five years in to his NFL career. He is what he is at this point. Turnarounds like Tannehill are exceptionally rare.
I was thinking this morning about this from the defensive side of the ball. Obviously neither Trubisky or Winston are what you want, but...If the defense becomes a top 5 unit again, would they rather have someone like Mitch who doesn't turn it over much but regularly sits out the entire first half. Or would they rather have someone like Jameis who will make some throws but also throw a ton of picks (including some pick 6s)?