To begin with, the Bears do not have a top 10 pass-pro offensive line.
But since the Bears still have some pass plays called, they either show that they are bad in those plays or are given the benefit of the doubt and are given some more pass attempts.
If they show that they are bad in the few pass plays that happen, they never have good numbers because they gave up pressure, hurries or sacks in the few passes that happened.
If the Bears do not give up pressures, sacks or hurries in the few pass attempts, then they never show that they are bad on the field because they never gave up any of those stuff.
This is not an argument with you, but more of this not making any sense.
- "They are bad"
- "How do you know, seeing that the tackles had pretty good Pass Pro ratings?"
- "Well, they hardly ever passed"
- "If they have pretty good Pass Pro ratings, they must not have done too badly when they were in Pass Pro, though it was limited. Why are you complaining?"
- "Because they hardly ever passed. The numbers would have dropped if there were more passes"
- "How do you know this, seeing that in limited passes, they showed that they were not that bad?"
- "Because they are bad"