- Joined:
- Sep 28, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,616
- Liked Posts:
- 10,212
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
Khalil Mack had a dominant performance this past Sunday, like most Sundays...
Yet he seemed all but invisible. How could this be?
In 2018, Vic Fangio maximized the vast talent of Mack by complimenting him with an unpredictable secondary that confused QB’s. These radical changes in coverage from snap to snap caused hesitation and forced the QB to hold the ball for an extra moment, allowing Mack time to get to the QB. Fangio schemed Mack into favorable matchups.
Chuck Pagano, on the other hand, uses Mack only as a crutch to help his own secondary. There is no complementary play or cohesion. Mack is burdened with the entire load. Mack is sacrificed for the betterment of the secondary behind him with no vice versa. Pagano uses him simply as a chess piece to absorb blockers.
Against Detroit, Mack was consistently beating his one on one’s and absorbing triple teams on 3rd longs. But the benefits were small in large part due to Pagano’s scheme and philosophy.
First of all, every single time Detroit single blocked Mack it was on a 3 step drop. And the less than handful of times it wasn’t a 3 step drop, Mack beat his man...
When teams started going heavy with the 3 step drops, Fangio would counter by sending a safety down hill in robber coverage against the underneath routes. This forces the QB to either hold the ball longer (good for Mack) or risk making a huge mistake (good for secondary). Pagano rarely makes in game adjustments, even though the opposing team is basically tipping off their play call when Mack is isolated one on one. This predictably hampers Mack’s production...
Same goes for the double teams. Fangio would threaten an a gap blitzer to keep double teams off of Mack or he would send him into coverage rather than mangling him in between a triple team. There is much more room to get creative in the secondary.
Here’s a triple team on Mack by a WR, TE, and LT, leaving two less targets to deal with, yet the Bears gained no edge on this play...
And until Pagano starts countering, the triple teams will continue.
Yet he seemed all but invisible. How could this be?
In 2018, Vic Fangio maximized the vast talent of Mack by complimenting him with an unpredictable secondary that confused QB’s. These radical changes in coverage from snap to snap caused hesitation and forced the QB to hold the ball for an extra moment, allowing Mack time to get to the QB. Fangio schemed Mack into favorable matchups.
Chuck Pagano, on the other hand, uses Mack only as a crutch to help his own secondary. There is no complementary play or cohesion. Mack is burdened with the entire load. Mack is sacrificed for the betterment of the secondary behind him with no vice versa. Pagano uses him simply as a chess piece to absorb blockers.
Against Detroit, Mack was consistently beating his one on one’s and absorbing triple teams on 3rd longs. But the benefits were small in large part due to Pagano’s scheme and philosophy.
First of all, every single time Detroit single blocked Mack it was on a 3 step drop. And the less than handful of times it wasn’t a 3 step drop, Mack beat his man...
When teams started going heavy with the 3 step drops, Fangio would counter by sending a safety down hill in robber coverage against the underneath routes. This forces the QB to either hold the ball longer (good for Mack) or risk making a huge mistake (good for secondary). Pagano rarely makes in game adjustments, even though the opposing team is basically tipping off their play call when Mack is isolated one on one. This predictably hampers Mack’s production...
Same goes for the double teams. Fangio would threaten an a gap blitzer to keep double teams off of Mack or he would send him into coverage rather than mangling him in between a triple team. There is much more room to get creative in the secondary.
Here’s a triple team on Mack by a WR, TE, and LT, leaving two less targets to deal with, yet the Bears gained no edge on this play...
And until Pagano starts countering, the triple teams will continue.
Last edited: