Is Chuck Pagano wasting Khalil Mack?

Adipost

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
8,616
Liked Posts:
10,212
Location:
Chicago, IL
Khalil Mack had a dominant performance this past Sunday, like most Sundays...

giphy.gif


SomberImmenseKillerwhale-size_restricted.gif


Yet he seemed all but invisible. How could this be?

In 2018, Vic Fangio maximized the vast talent of Mack by complimenting him with an unpredictable secondary that confused QB’s. These radical changes in coverage from snap to snap caused hesitation and forced the QB to hold the ball for an extra moment, allowing Mack time to get to the QB. Fangio schemed Mack into favorable matchups.

Chuck Pagano, on the other hand, uses Mack only as a crutch to help his own secondary. There is no complementary play or cohesion. Mack is burdened with the entire load. Mack is sacrificed for the betterment of the secondary behind him with no vice versa. Pagano uses him simply as a chess piece to absorb blockers.

Against Detroit, Mack was consistently beating his one on one’s and absorbing triple teams on 3rd longs. But the benefits were small in large part due to Pagano’s scheme and philosophy.

First of all, every single time Detroit single blocked Mack it was on a 3 step drop. And the less than handful of times it wasn’t a 3 step drop, Mack beat his man...

giphy.gif


giphy.gif


giphy.gif


When teams started going heavy with the 3 step drops, Fangio would counter by sending a safety down hill in robber coverage against the underneath routes. This forces the QB to either hold the ball longer (good for Mack) or risk making a huge mistake (good for secondary). Pagano rarely makes in game adjustments, even though the opposing team is basically tipping off their play call when Mack is isolated one on one. This predictably hampers Mack’s production...

giphy.gif


Same goes for the double teams. Fangio would threaten an a gap blitzer to keep double teams off of Mack or he would send him into coverage rather than mangling him in between a triple team. There is much more room to get creative in the secondary.

Here’s a triple team on Mack by a WR, TE, and LT, leaving two less targets to deal with, yet the Bears gained no edge on this play...

giphy.gif


And until Pagano starts countering, the triple teams will continue.
 
Last edited:

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,033
Liked Posts:
12,358
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
Great post.
 

PrideisBears

Bully Mod
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
38,294
Liked Posts:
32,945
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
Glad someone said it. I honestly was PISSED vic left because he utilized everyone. Pagano seems to just leave our pass rushers on an island
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,375
Liked Posts:
23,655
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Khalil Mack had a dominant performance this past Sunday, like most Sundays...

giphy.gif


Yet he seemed all but invisible. How could this be?

In 2018, Vic Fangio maximized the vast talent of Mack by complimenting him with an unpredictable secondary that confused QB’s. These radical changes in coverage from snap to snap caused hesitation and forced the QB to hold the ball for an extra moment, allowing Mack time to get to the QB. Fangio schemed Mack into favorable matchups.

Chuck Pagano, on the other hand, uses Mack only as a crutch to help his own secondary. There is no complementary play or cohesion. Mack is burdened with the entire load. Mack is sacrificed for the betterment of the secondary behind him with no vice versa. Pagano uses him simply as a chess piece to absorb blockers.

Against Detroit, Mack was consistently beating his one on one’s and absorbing triple teams on 3rd longs. But the benefits were small in large part due to Pagano’s scheme and philosophy.

First of all, every single time Detroit single blocked Mack it was on a 3 step drop. And the less than handful of times it wasn’t a 3 step drop, Mack beat his man...

giphy.gif


giphy.gif


giphy.gif


When teams started going heavy with the 3 step drops, Fangio would counter by sending a safety down hill in robber coverage against the underneath routes. This forces the QB to either hold the ball longer (good for Mack) or risk making a huge mistake (good for secondary). Pagano rarely makes in game adjustments, even though the opposing team is basically tipping off their play call when Mack is isolated one on one. This predictably hampers Mack’s production...

giphy.gif


Same goes for the double teams. Fangio would threaten an a gap blitzer to keep double teams off of Mack or he would send him into coverage rather than mangling him in between a triple team. There is much more room to get creative in the secondary.

Here’s a triple team on Mack by a WR, TE, and LT, leaving two less targets to deal with, yet the Bears gained no edge on this play...

giphy.gif


And until Pagano starts countering, the triple teams will continue.
You're right but that's why Quinn is here. It should free up Mack or allow Quinn to feed instead. Of course, it doesn't matter if he's on the bench. They addressed this in a way to allow Pagano to do Pagano.

And I sure hope that the NFL looks at last weeks film and removes their push the points mandate. The Mack holding as egregious but it wasn't isolated to that game. When you see stuff like this league wide, it makes one question the credibility of the NFL. It literally could have cost us this game.
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
17,978
Liked Posts:
19,694
Location:
MICHIGAN
We’ve been bagging on pagano all off-season and in last Sunday’s igt. Something is up and I’m laying it in paganos lap
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,033
Liked Posts:
12,358
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
I never thought of it this way, but the OP is right that Pagano sees things through the defensive backfield's perspective.

But what's weird is that pretty much every idiot knows that nothing helps the DBs more than a pass rush.
 

PrideisBears

Bully Mod
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
38,294
Liked Posts:
32,945
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
I mean, I didn't think Mack was invisible, but most people think if he doesn't get 30 sacks and 16 FF in a game that he didn't do shit.
He needs a sack per dollar he makes or else he sucks
 

jonimus

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 27, 2011
Posts:
928
Liked Posts:
673
Wow. Awesome post Adipost. Honestly hadn't thought of it that way.

Vic was a genius on D and everybody knows that. Pagano is well respected as a coach/D coordinator but clearly doesn't get as exotic as Fangio. While he's not going to drop Mack into coverage, I would hope he can adjust to bring a blitzer on Mack's side or drop a safety on teams going 3 step drop heavy.

Those clips make me a lot more optimistic about Mack. That was a dirty spin move and outside-in juke on the tackle.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,449
Liked Posts:
17,172
A lot of incredibly stupid fucks on this board think Mack just sucks and isn't doing what we're paying him to do.

I've mentioned it before. A lot of bears fans, not just ones on here, never watch any part of the play besides where the ball is.
 

Bust

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 5, 2020
Posts:
9,299
Liked Posts:
4,481
al
Those clips make me a lot more optimistic about Mack. That was a dirty spin move and outside-in juke on the tackle.

It was missed cause most tv fans rely on replay and announcers. Some zoom in on and focus line of scrimmage play. The tandem and camera crew that did the lions/bears game all but ignored that part of the game.
 
Last edited:

Visionman

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2017
Posts:
7,995
Liked Posts:
4,451
Whether it’s Mack or Pagano, the pass rush has to improve. It’s foolish to invest all that cap in an elite pass rusher just to let him get taken out of the game...
 

Black Rainbow

ChatGPT Created Account
Donator
Joined:
Apr 19, 2014
Posts:
17,478
Liked Posts:
8,154
So before Pagano got here...remember the book was, "his secondary is always good."

Now we know why. Am I getting that right?
 

gallagher

Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
6,385
Liked Posts:
5,630
Location:
Semi-Nomadic
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
al

It was missed cause most tv fans rely on replay and announcers. Some zoom in on and focus line of scrimmage play. The tandem and camera crew that did the lions/bears game all but ignored that part of the game.
Dude the camera crew really needed the preseason to get their act together. This weekend I hope we have a better crew
 

gallagher

Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
6,385
Liked Posts:
5,630
Location:
Semi-Nomadic
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
A lot of incredibly stupid fucks on this board think Mack just sucks and isn't doing what we're paying him to do.
Lotta people don't realize that when the opposing teams scheme to eliminate the threat of 52, that is the rest of the DLs job to get to the QB!

When they triple team Mack, we have at least three other dudes that gotta get past a single blocker. When they go with quick passes, the throw has to be on the money or they are gonna end up punting back to us. Mack did a great job, even if it didn't show up in the sack column of the stat sheet
 

cubsforlife

Member
Joined:
Sep 10, 2019
Posts:
92
Liked Posts:
65
I’m not a fan of Pagano. If anyone wants to tell him, it’s okay.

To me, Pagano is fine. I think we all just miss Vic. He's one of, if not the best defensive minds in football. No matter who we brought in, I thought we'd face some drop off.
 

Top