Forty-six
Active member
- Joined:
- Nov 8, 2020
- Posts:
- 143
- Liked Posts:
- 189
There is no way to get an accurate measure of what Claypool is from the chaos that was last season. The o-line was a mess. Fields was running for his life on most drop backs. There was no true number 1 receiver in Chicago last year. Claypool was dropped into that mess, obviously with no training camp reps with Fields, midway through the season. No one would have been successful last season with those ingredients.
Claypool had 62 catches for 873 yards and 11 TD's in his rookie season. That was 2020. He's 6'4" 238 lbs and he's 24 years old. Trading a number 2 pick for a guy like that seems like a reasonable gamble given his measurables and potential. Maybe he's a bust. Maybe he'll become an electric playmaker. Every GM whiffs on picks and trades. No GM bats .1000. I like Poles' willingness to try to add what could be a dynamic playmaker to a team that lacks exactly that. We should have a much better idea of who Claypool is by late November or December. Give it time.
Claypool had 62 catches for 873 yards and 11 TD's in his rookie season. That was 2020. He's 6'4" 238 lbs and he's 24 years old. Trading a number 2 pick for a guy like that seems like a reasonable gamble given his measurables and potential. Maybe he's a bust. Maybe he'll become an electric playmaker. Every GM whiffs on picks and trades. No GM bats .1000. I like Poles' willingness to try to add what could be a dynamic playmaker to a team that lacks exactly that. We should have a much better idea of who Claypool is by late November or December. Give it time.