K.Whyte the real sleeper?

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
34,037
Liked Posts:
-951
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
See I don't. If he gets poached, he is gone period. But forget whether or not he gets poached, as a matter of fact let's assume Bearly is right and he does NOT get poached with that jaw-dropping speed, ok.

Does he make the 53 eventually? What if he can't develop better NFL level vision and cuts? I mean NEVER can. Did he "bust" out of the NFL? Did he meet expectations for the coach? For himself?

No one in theiright mind would give Pace a black mark on his record for taking a flier on Whyte. Not for that one draft pick, no. But that's not the same as saying he wouldn't be a bust.

In my opinion he's not considered a bust in the way of Pace or his scouts for drafting him in the 7th round if he not only doesn't make the 53 but NEVER develops whatever he would need to make not only our 53 but any 53. It's a damn 7th round pick. Most 4th and 5th round picks don't make the 53 of their teams.
 

Visionman

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2017
Posts:
7,995
Liked Posts:
4,451
yes and nor should there be expectations from fans as the 7th round typically is a crapshoot when it comes to making the team.

But we were talking on two different levels: fans like you and the player himself which is where I was viewing things.

I am sure he has expectations on himself to DO this and make it. He has to imo to even HAVE the slim chance he has.
So using that logic, if UDFAs and tryout players don't make the 53, they should be considered busts?

TC rosters are 90 players. So I guess each team has a minimum of 37 busts per season.

Man...these GMs suck!
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
34,037
Liked Posts:
-951
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Yes. This. If Whyte can show NFL level cuts and moveswith timing along with that speed, then he would be an historic steal. And no one would give a fuck who is cut for him.

It's also why it's so hard to believe it will happen.

If he shows out as a returner then they're gonna wanna keep him around if they think he could replace Patterson after this year and save $5 mil per. It's so early for any of us to know who will or won't make the 53 because sometimes players just adjust there games better to the NFL. A 7th rounder could just get drafted into a situation that works for him and his game adjusts and then a 3rd or 4th rounder could do the exact opposite and that 7th rounder takes the 3rd-4th rounders spot on the 53 simply because of how those players adjust to the next level.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
34,037
Liked Posts:
-951
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
So using that logic, if UDFAs and tryout players don't make the 53, they should be considered busts?

TC rosters are 90 players. So I guess each team has a minimum of 37 busts per season.

Man...these GMs suck!

Yeah i'm not sure i'd put it that way...lol. Shit i don't even know who's arguing what point out of you guys anymore...LOL.
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,401
Liked Posts:
23,670
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
i'm not saying he'll be a RB but he may not steal a spot form WR either and take the roster spot of one of our backfield guys instead. They may just keep him or Whyte as a specialist as well but that's become less likely in the current NFL.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
32,623
Liked Posts:
19,030
I love this place sometimes.

Yes it is free for everyone. I started my post with the fact I don't own a phone. FB being free for everyone (me and the people I want to stay in close contact with) IS one of the reasons why a phone with monthly service is not needed for me.

I just thought it odd to use the phrase “get Facebook for free” when that is the only way to do it.
(And that is about what it’s worth, btw.)
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,401
Liked Posts:
23,670
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Well if we only keep 3 RB's then i change what i just said about him making the 53 because i thought we kept 4 at times last year especially the 2nd half with Howard, Cohen, Benny and Mizzell but there's no way Whyte beats out any one of Montgomery, M.Davis or T.Cohen. Unless M.Davis isn't what they thought he was gonna be or K.Whyte just simply shows out in TC and preseason then i could see them giving much more thought to K.Whyte over M.Davis. Not sure how excited i'd be to have two rookies in our only 3 RB's we have on the 53 but the kid has talent so i'll be excited to see what he does.
We did but rarely keep 4 on the original 53. If we don't have FB/HB, it could be we keep 4 but that was all explained.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
11,860
Liked Posts:
8,169
That's exactly what Bearly says. I have no idea what "expectations" are on a 7th round pick if NOT making the 53. No one has actually answered that yet.
Since you want an answer, I will give my opinion.

Let's start with an early 1st rounder.

If he starts, he is meeting the expectations of a 1st rounder.
If he stars, he is exceeding the expectations for his position unless he is one of the blue chip players (usually 3 to 5 per year). If he is a blue chip player and stars, he is just meeting expectations.
If he does not become a starter within the 1st 3 seasons, he is a bust.
If he does considerably worse than 1st rounders picked much later than him, he is at least a disappointment, if not a bust.

Now let's go to the 7th rounders.

If he starts, he is a sleeper.
If he stars, he is a super sleeper.
If he does not become a starter within the 1st 3 seasons, he is a special teams player.
If he does considerably worse than players drafted after him or UDFAs, he is a special teams player.
If he does not make the 53 roster, he is a practice squad player.
If he does not make the 53 man roster, gets picked up by another team and does well for the other team, he is the one that got away.
If he does not make the practice squad nor picked up by another team, he is a disappointment.
If he gets arrested for selling drugs, he is busted (the only choice that ties a 7th rounder with the word bust).
 

Brownie

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
2,344
Liked Posts:
3,343
If they could somehow have Howard-Cohen-Cunningham-Mizzel on the roster last year, surely the could fit Cohen-Davis-Montgomery-Whtye somehow, right? With the understanding that Whyte has to be able to play ST just as BC did.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
44,494
Liked Posts:
39,062
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
I always have a soft spot for the late round guys, so I hope he succeeds with the Bears. I don't mind too much if it's with another team not in the NFC North.

That's all I got.
 

Pegger

President Stoopid
Joined:
Sep 18, 2012
Posts:
7,621
Liked Posts:
5,873
Location:
Communist Canada
Cohen
Montgomery
Davis
Patterson

Wouldn’t he be #5?

Wait a sec, are you talking about a 5 headed rushing attack! For the love of god, that's some magical, unattainable percentage better than the rumored 3 headed attack!

Bring it!

Wait a god damn second. I'm just spit ballin here... What if we had another RB? I'm no rocket surgeon, but based on counting fingers I'm seeing a RB room with somewhere close to 6 runningbacks!

Imagine that 6 headed monster! It would be the Greek Moster known as the Hydra:

1631

Look at that monster! Imagine that creature with a ball on one of the mouths while the other's just head butt defenders like an old school Madden stiff arm!
 

Visionman

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 28, 2017
Posts:
7,995
Liked Posts:
4,451
We did but rarely keep 4 on the original 53. If we don't have FB/HB, it could be we keep 4 but that was all explained.
Even if we keep 4, it's doubtful all 4 will be active on game day. Especially since they will have Patterson active who can fill in at RB if needed.

It will come down to who can be the best ST player (not returns) and the most important gadget player for the offense...
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,401
Liked Posts:
23,670
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I think that's obviously Patterson plus they paid him a lot for it.
 

JUSTFINGWIN

Active member
Joined:
Nov 16, 2018
Posts:
313
Liked Posts:
339
Imo, I think he's just a pure kick returner. He does not have the lateral movement to be an effective NFL RB.
 

BearDen

High Ranking Member
Joined:
May 18, 2014
Posts:
5,730
Liked Posts:
4,511
Anyone think it's odd how Vu closed my thread with the last post but somehow BearDen still had time to get a like in that thread closing post? Hmmmmmmmmm.... :unsure::unsure::unsure::unsure:
Anyone can react to any post in a locked thread. Are you this dumb on purpose?
 

Tjodalv

Discoverer of Dragosaurs
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
16,036
Liked Posts:
14,785
Anyone think it's odd how Vu closed my thread with the last post but somehow BearDen still had time to get a like in that thread closing post? Hmmmmmmmmm.... :unsure::unsure::unsure::unsure:

Fuck yeah!!! Bear Den is part of "the team" now? Why wasn't I informed by super-secret email?
 

Outlaw Josey Cutler

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 5, 2012
Posts:
4,300
Liked Posts:
2,527
Location:
NJ
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Penn State Nittany Lions
So using that logic, if UDFAs and tryout players don't make the 53, they should be considered busts?

TC rosters are 90 players. So I guess each team has a minimum of 37 busts per season.

Man...these GMs suck!

So using that logic, if UDFAs and tryout players don't make the 53, they should be considered busts?

Correct. If you know of a better term than "bust" for failure to make the team, then please offer it.

TC rosters are 90 players. So I guess each team has a minimum of 37 busts per season.

Yes, correct.

Man...these GMs suck!

That depends on the W-L record but I suspect lower bust ratios are directly proportional to higher win percentage.

I get you were going for a reductio ad absurdum dismissal of me, yet you seem to not be tracking the general context of the discussion at hand.

Please post better soon, thanks
 

Top