Market price for Roquan smith extension?

vinson555

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
1,585
Liked Posts:
591
I doubt they won't try to resign him, but I also doubt it won't be cheap. Likely after the 5th year, we are talking about a top three cover LB and top 5 overall at that point.
 

Chicagosports89

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
14,408
Liked Posts:
20,685
I doubt they won't try to resign him, but I also doubt it won't be cheap. Likely after the 5th year, we are talking about a top three cover LB and top 5 overall at that point.
So many negatives in that first sentence to decipher. By doubting it won't be cheap, that means you think it will be cheap?
 

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
6,441
Liked Posts:
7,467
Got to pay him. He’s the staple the next 5-6 years. He’s still so young with a lot of experience already.
That's just it. He's the next one in a long line of great inside backers on the Bears.
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
20,829
Liked Posts:
29,579
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
Remember how much trouble he gave us with his rookie contract…..
With his original holding out over contract language, his mystery 2019 "personal issue," his predilection for partying with porn stars, or him being the only starting defensive veteran at OTA's, he is an enigma. Is he a players rights pioneer, a head case, or a great young player and young leader that has had a few unsavory spotlight moments?

That said, I see no rush to re-sign him. He is a Bear for the next 2 seasons for $13M and is controlled for 2 more years for $40M.

So he is basically playing on a 4yr/$53M contract with $0 in dead money after 2022 vs Warner's 5yr/$95M and $17M in dead cap after 2022. Now if he and the Bears can agree to a mutually beneficial contract fine, but I would not be negotiating anywhere near Fred Warner money.
 
Last edited:

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
17,975
Liked Posts:
19,689
Location:
MICHIGAN
He deserves top dollar more so than Eddie Jackson ever did. We only know him talent wise. Team will need to make a judgement call if it’s worth 20mil a year based on other factors like his mental health
 

Decatur Staley

CBMB Legend
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,414
Liked Posts:
443
Location:
Rockford, IL
With his original holding out over contract language, his mystery 2019 "personal issue," his predilection for partying with porn stars, or him being the only starting defensive veteran at OTA's, he is an enigma. Is he a players rights pioneer, a head case, or a great young player and young leader that has had a few unsavory spotlight moments?

That said, I see no rush to re-sign him. He is a Bear for the next 2 seasons for $13M and is controlled for 2 more years for $40M.

So he is basically playing on a 4yr/$53M contract with $0 in dead money after 2022 vs Warner's 5yr/$95M and $17M in dead cap after 2022. Now if he and the Bears can agree to a mutually beneficial contract fine, but I would not be negotiating anywhere near Fred Warner money.

He'll hold out before being tagged 2X, but I agree with you... Doesn't make sense to give an ILB top tier money given our cap issues (unless we can get out of Quinn's albatross of a contract).
 

Chicagosports89

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
14,408
Liked Posts:
20,685
He'll hold out before being tagged 2X, but I agree with you... Doesn't make sense to give an ILB top tier money given our cap issues (unless we can get out of Quinn's albatross of a contract).
He never mentioned the tag. Everyone knows Quinn is gone after this year. Roquan extension wouldn't effect the cap until 2 years out from now, which the cap situation can be a lot better by then.
 
Last edited:

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,542
He'll hold out before being tagged 2X, but I agree with you... Doesn't make sense to give an ILB top tier money given our cap issues (unless we can get out of Quinn's albatross of a contract).
Can get out of Quinn's contract after 2021, easy after 2022. Cap issues don't really exist after 2021. Quinn, Hicks, Foles, possibly Trevathan and Robinson will potentially be all off the books. Cheap QB, LT, and CB.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
57,910
Liked Posts:
37,882
He'll hold out before being tagged 2X, but I agree with you... Doesn't make sense to give an ILB top tier money given our cap issues (unless we can get out of Quinn's albatross of a contract).
Warner was not a 1st round pick hence why he would have been a free agent next year. Quan was a 1st rounder and thus we exercised the 5th year option. So he is not a free agent until 2023.

So he can play out the next two years and then if nothing is worked out just franchise him and work it out. New TV deal will be in effect starting 2023 so probably better to wait to see how that impacts the cap.
 

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,542
Warner is probably better than Roquan, but Leonard certainly is not, despite his better reputation (probowls, ROY). Good thing is that number won't go up too much either way. If Roquan has another good year in 2021, let him play out the 5th year. Then work on re-signing him. Worst case scenario, he gets hurt and the Bears save some or all of the potential money they owe him. Best case, he continues to play very well and gets 20M/year instead of 19M that those 2 got. No big deal.
 

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
13,823
Liked Posts:
12,614
My first thoughts are “wow that’s a lot for an ILB…”

I don’t see any of those guys a GREAT HOF type player. Luke Kuechly was the last one oil would have aobcoadered worthy of a contract like that.

That’s just me though.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Half Mod.
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
39,080
Liked Posts:
52,066
Just for giggles….. if you could only have one….. Quan or AR? Who you extending?
 

Top