- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,414
- Liked Posts:
- 443
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
Just for giggles….. if you could only have one….. Quan or AR? Who you extending?
AR 100 times out of 100
Just for giggles….. if you could only have one….. Quan or AR? Who you extending?
Interesting. Not sure I agree there but like the strong take.AR 100 times out of 100
Just for giggles….. if you could only have one….. Quan or AR? Who you extending?
Warner was not a 1st round pick hence why he would have been a free agent next year. Quan was a 1st rounder and thus we exercised the 5th year option. So he is not a free agent until 2023.
So he can play out the next two years and then if nothing is worked out just franchise him and work it out. New TV deal will be in effect starting 2023 so probably better to wait to see how that impacts the cap.
Yet the Bears history suggests the exact opposite.Roquan.
Much harder position to get correct imo
Interesting. Not sure I agree there but like the strong take.
Yet the Bears history suggests the exact opposite.
Yeah no doubt to an extent; Alshon and Marty Booker are our two 'studs' in nearly 20 years of drafts.I think that correlates more with the lack of a good signal caller.
Roquan and it isn't close. But I'd rather not sink that much money into either of those positions. Roquan is at least top 5 at his spot thoughJust for giggles….. if you could only have one….. Quan or AR? Who you extending?
You realize there are other teams eh?Yet the Bears history suggests the exact opposite.
I’d go with Quan too because of age and I think he’s still an ascending player.Roquan and it isn't close. But I'd rather not sink that much money into either of those positions. Roquan is at least top 5 at his spot though
I love AR but Quan all day. You don’t need an elite WR to win but he is the middle of our defense, we need thatJust for giggles….. if you could only have one….. Quan or AR? Who you extending?
Ya, the franchise twice was in response to the Hoosier optometrist who suggested he's under team control for 4 more years... I just don't think he'd be accepting of the franchise tag given his contractual complications in the past.
Everyone rightly pointed out that our cap situation will probably be in a very different position two years from now, so Quinn probably won't have any impact... But that also assumes Pace doesn't do anything stupid over the next two years. Which would be a nice surprise.
View attachment 12681
20 years 2 receivers that rank anywhere near average, but go ahead and blame it on other teams.
Yet you seem to have forgotten the reason for that dispute and it had nothing to do with how much he was being paid. It was about making sure he gets that money. The NFL's player contracts are built to fuck them every way possible for not being perfect little soldiers.Remember how much trouble he gave us with his rookie contract…..
Warner is probably better than Roquan, but Leonard certainly is not, despite his better reputation (probowls, ROY). Good thing is that number won't go up too much either way. If Roquan has another good year in 2021, let him play out the 5th year. Then work on re-signing him. Worst case scenario, he gets hurt and the Bears save some or all of the potential money they owe him. Best case, he continues to play very well and gets 20M/year instead of 19M that those 2 got. No big deal.
I can buy that. It's a coin toss really. PFF likes Warner a lot more than Roquan for whatever reason. I put Warner slightly ahead due to not missing a game in 3 years vs 4 for Smith (not including playoffs). Warner is probably a touch better in coverage. Smith a better run defender and immensely better blitzer. So, could go either way.I don't think he is.