- Joined:
- Apr 19, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,475
- Liked Posts:
- 8,153
Well just keep him if that's all you get.
Duh.
Well just keep him if that's all you get.
Mooney was a 5th round pick.Can't wait till we use that pick on some random scrub WR we all nutride for 3 months only to see him get sent to die on the practice squad.
I'm in.Look, I'm done debating this. Let's put our money where our mouths are.
Before this decade is out, the compensation we received for this trade will be cited as a reason we should fire Ryan Poles. And I don't mean by a random person here or there, but will be talked about by the "experts" as a reason.
Ban bet, 1 year.
Why does everyone compare these two trades? It was different teams under different scenarios with different financial ramifications.How does this random twat know what happened? How does anyone know whether a first time GM with little contacts was able to squeeze the most out of a trade.
Is it hard to believe he could have been given a take it now or leave it offer or some other negotiation tactic he may have been taken advantage of. Why do I or anyone else not have the right to react or question?
And I'm not one to say he didn't get fair value, its asanine to just assume Poles got the best offer possible simply because he is a GM.
Would the bears even save any money trading Jackson?Eddie Jackson....you're next!
He's the complete opposite of what Poles wants in a player......however good luck getting anything for him if another team takes on his contract
Personally; I'd also move Quinn while his value is as high as it will be....get another 2nd or 3rd, this year
Later, Leming walked this back.
How does this random twat know what happened? How does anyone know whether a first time GM with little contacts was able to squeeze the most out of a trade.
Is it hard to believe he could have been given a take it now or leave it offer or some other negotiation tactic he may have been taken advantage of. Why do I or anyone else not have the right to react or question?
And I'm not one to say he didn't get fair value, its asanine to just assume Poles got the best offer possible simply because he is a GM.
None of it is guaranteed. They could use him as a 1 yr rental like Miller for $17.75M.Chargers take all $63M.
"I'm sorry, Mack. I had to make a choice."@Shepard is this decision worst than the one you made to kill Kaidan instead of the space racist?
but it's off our booksNone of it is guaranteed. They could use him as a 1 yr rental like Miller for $17.75M.
I bet that crappy 2000 GMC Sierra you bought for $10k four years ago probably sold for the same amount now, right?Buy high, sell low.
Great move by the Bears?
ok so this Jonathan wood guy has sources? insider source? like being in Poles pants getting Poled???
WE PAYED MORE WHEN WE GOT HIM FOUR YEARS AGO FROM THE RAIDERS THOUGHWhy does everyone compare these two trades? It was different teams under different scenarios with different financial ramifications.
How does this random twat know what happened? How does anyone know whether a first time GM with little contacts was able to squeeze the most out of a trade.
Is it hard to believe he could have been given a take it now or leave it offer or some other negotiation tactic he may have been taken advantage of. Why do I or anyone else not have the right to react or question?
And I'm not one to say he didn't get fair value, its asanine to just assume Poles got the best offer possible simply because he is a GM.