- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,428
- Liked Posts:
- 38,978
My favorite teams
I guess if Marshall cut grass in the offseason he'd get a Dennis Quaid movie.But...bagging groceries...
I guess if Marshall cut grass in the offseason he'd get a Dennis Quaid movie.But...bagging groceries...
If it's Hollywood, it'd be something named like The Grounds Keeper.I guess if Marshall cut grass in the offseason he'd get a Dennis Quaid movie.
The 2013 chiefs had all pro talent at rb, wr, lt, lb, s. My point stands, the bears are not there yet:
Who? Charles was an all pro, along with Berry, but certainly not WR's Donnie Avery, Dwayne Bowe, or LT Brandon Albert. Not saying that the Chiefs that year did not have a strong 3-4 defense, but the offense had Smith/Charles and not much else.The 2013 chiefs had all pro talent at rb, wr, lt, lb, s. My point stands, the bears are not there yet:
Dumbass
Claims are made based on the facts as they present them self at the current time. If the personnel changes, so does the argument. The argument then was clearly about the bears O-line as it existed in that point in time.
Same can be said about my claims on the Bears current O-line. If they somehow go out and get two pro-bowl tackles, yes, that would change my claims considerably.
It's not rocket science.
SMDH
Woah woah, can’t pencil these guys in because there are some highly touted, by morons on this board, late round picks that could be pushing these studs for a starting position!Ladies and Gentleman your Bears 2022 O-line
LT Tevon Jenkins| 47.5
LG Cody Whitehair | 66.0
C Lucas Patrick | 57.6
RG Dakota Dozier (?) | 47.5
RT Larry Borom | 61.4
Passing notes to The Beckys gets you ignored for a year.@PrideisBears this is his humble response “rare” times he’s wrong lol lol
Past performance is not subjective, it is fact. Just because there is an allowance for small variance, that does not change the facts.No claims are made based on subjective beliefs. If it were a fact it would not be a claim but a fact.
So you formes an opinion and we will find out if it is true when the games are played. Not the other way around.
No worries, everyone of them is going to improve because of "scheme" and "coaching". Not a single one will regress.Woah woah, can’t pencil these guys in because there are some highly touted, by morons on this board, late round picks that could be pushing these studs for a starting position!
He got a lot better or at least played a lot better once he got to KC. Harbaugh gave up on him after they went 0-13 on third downs in the playoffs against the Giants and it was Kap's team after that.Yeah, i was just bringing up that him becoming a better NFL QB didn't start with A.Reid is all.
I can’t believe Sherman has been with the team that long.Who? Charles was an all pro, along with Berry, but certainly not WR's Donnie Avery, Dwayne Bowe, or LT Brandon Albert. Not saying that the Chiefs that year did not have a strong 3-4 defense, but the offense had Smith/Charles and not much else.
Past performance is not subjective, it is fact. Just because there is an allowance for small variance, that does not change the facts.
And yet you modeled your projections around these subjective grades.PFF's evaluation of OL play is subjective. They are watching each play and making a subjective determination of their performance. Hence why their grades differ from others and scouts.
Patrick for example gave up 2 sacks. So how are you deciding he sucks? Because of PFF's subjective grade dummy. So your claim is based on subjective grades.
And yet you modeled your projections around these subjective grades.
Got it!
Give him a break, he's going through some personal changes (ie. Sex change, and transitioning from bears fan to lions fan)Yes. I have no problem with subjective grading. I have a problem with idiots claimimg subjective grades are facts.
This whole argument is about you stupidly claiming opinions as facts and then being too stubborn to admit you misspoke.
Their going to have tilt the camera down to make sure that Murray is in the shot
It's not just the OL play that is subjective.PFF's evaluation of OL play is subjective. They are watching each play and making a subjective determination of their performance. Hence why their grades differ from others and scouts.
Patrick for example gave up 2 sacks. So how are you deciding he sucks? Because of PFF's subjective grade dummy. So your claim is based on subjective grades.