OK with Desai gone when Bears clean house

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,357
Liked Posts:
17,095
What I really hate is just sitting in base defense all game and letting Jimmy pick our defense apart with absolutely no blitzing or doing anything to put Jimmy under any pressure. I want to have an attacking defense not this garbage.

I do agree, but it's a double edged sword.

Both our starting safeties were out and our corners already suck balls. There is only so much you can get away with as far as blitzing goes against a guy like shanny until it hurts you.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
57,904
Liked Posts:
37,876
Dude. You are so dug in on this Desai thing. Jonson maybe a starter on other teams? Lol.

Their talent level is fine. They have issues in the secondary, but their front 7 is still as talented as almost any team in the league. A DL with Goldman and Hicks should not be getting gashed as much as they do against the run. This is the worst run defense the Bears have had since Mel Tucker.

A well coordinated defense doesn't have as many communication errors and blown coverages as the Bears have had. Part of a coach's responsibility is to build a culture of winning habits. Attention to details, swarming to the football, being fundamentally sound, and not committing dumb penalties are all a reflection on coaching. The Bears defense does none of these things well.

If Desai is an upgrade over Pagano, I'm not sure it's by much. He damn sure isn't HC material based on these 8 games. That I do know.

That DL is all rotational guys. Just a couple weeks ago Bears fans were talking about how Goldman wanted to retire now you acting like he is an all pro. Hicks is a situational player at this point. They have no anchor on that DL. Mack was not only a good pass rusher but a top 5 run defender at edge.

Run D is all about winning at the point of attack. This team got gashed in the run game because the DL got beat one on one and Quan is a run around the blocker ILB not a stack and shed LB. It was Danny T that used to take on blockers and let Quan roam but Ogletree and Quan are both guys that prefer to try and run around blockers rather than take them head on. Once you get a blocker on them they are done.


Look at Ogletree here. Instead of taking on the block and shedding to get to Deebo, he tries to go inside and under which allows Deebo to beat him to the edge. That is not how you are coached and that is all because guys like Quan and Ogletree don't like taking on blocks. If either he or Shelly had tried to take on and shed the blocker, it slows Deebo down and possibly gets a holding call. Instead both of them try to play matador and Deebo gets by them and the blockers don't even have to worry about trying to hold them to prevent a play.
 

hyatt151

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
10,836
Liked Posts:
3,529
one thing for certain, in he game thread some posters bitched about penalty's not called on the 49er's on tis play, SORRY just don't see it
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,033
Liked Posts:
12,358
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
Desai didn't get two completely ridiculous pass interference calls and 100% blow a coverage, two of those on the last drive.

Vildor single-handedly ruined an great performance by the defense today, including the coordinator. Aside from those three total boners, he was trash as well.
 

pablovi

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2012
Posts:
6,445
Liked Posts:
2,044
Location:
México city
Desai didn't get two completely ridiculous pass interference calls and 100% blow a coverage, two of those on the last drive.

Vildor single-handedly ruined an great performance by the defense today, including the coordinator. Aside from those three total boners, he was trash as well.
Watch the game! He had a single safety deep! When they needed a TD to win the game with very little time left. He should be in max coverage letting the kid throw the ball with coverage instead of wanting to sack him.
 

Bear_Assed

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
2,927
Liked Posts:
2,771
He also called a play that had Quinn in coverage on the last big pass play of the stealers game. And Big Ben saw it and got 20 yrds and his kicker in FG range
 

Shepard

Renegade
Donator
Joined:
May 31, 2013
Posts:
2,291
Liked Posts:
1,184
Location:
SE WI
Oh the entire staff should be gone. Organization needs to be washed from President on down. I mean we all know the ownership should be out, but you know.

Start with a new President and then work your way down from there. No need to retain ANYONE.
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,033
Liked Posts:
12,358
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
Watch the game! He had a single safety deep! When they needed a TD to win the game with very little time left. He should be in max coverage letting the kid throw the ball with coverage instead of wanting to sack him.
Talking football with you is like talking calculus with a six year old.

His game plan worked great all day today. Tied for the most sacks ever against a John Harbaugh team. They are never even a position to lose if Vildor doesn't commit that atrocious penalty and DHC doesn't drop a floater.

If he had dropped into a soft zone at the end and they had scored, you'd be crying about that as well because you don't understand what you are looking at.

Also they had plenty of time, over a minute with two timeouts inside the 40.
 

pablovi

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2012
Posts:
6,445
Liked Posts:
2,044
Location:
México city
Talking football with you is like talking calculus with a six year old.

His game plan worked great all day today. Tied for the most sacks ever against a John Harbaugh team. They are never even a position to lose if Vildor doesn't commit that atrocious penalty and DHC doesn't drop a floater.

If he had dropped into a soft zone at the end and they had scored, you'd be crying about that as well because you don't understand what you are looking at.
No soft zone. Max coverage! Pressure was working because they had no urgency to score! And had a first time starter at QB. You cannot play the same way when they need score! It’s basic football.

And yeah, Vildor sucks! We know that, so why making him cover anyone on that last drive?
 

pablovi

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2012
Posts:
6,445
Liked Posts:
2,044
Location:
México city
Talking football with you is like talking calculus with a six year old.

His game plan worked great all day today. Tied for the most sacks ever against a John Harbaugh team. They are never even a position to lose if Vildor doesn't commit that atrocious penalty and DHC doesn't drop a floater.

If he had dropped into a soft zone at the end and they had scored, you'd be crying about that as well because you don't understand what you are looking at.

Also they had plenty of time, over a minute with two timeouts inside the 40.
Post in thread 'Third week in row the Bears D blew the game.'
Third week in row the Bears D blew the game.
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,033
Liked Posts:
12,358
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
No soft zone. Max coverage! Pressure was working because they had no urgency to score! And had a first time starter at QB. You cannot play the same way when they need score! It’s basic football.

And yeah, Vildor sucks! We know that, so why making him cover anyone on that last drive?
You don't understand football. Max coverage isn't a thing, and if it is a thing it's a soft zone. Also who the fuck told you that you can't play the same way when a team 'needs to score?'

Any idiot knows you blitz the shit out of young QB. If your CB does his job and doesn't blow that coverage, it's likely a different outcome.
 

BearClaw55

SELL THE TEAM
Donator
Joined:
Aug 13, 2010
Posts:
2,082
Liked Posts:
1,782
It was a terrible scheme & blown coverage (once again) that allowed the Ravens that final score. But, it’s sad when the offense is so bad that when the defense has 6 sacks & only allows one TD. The defense gets hammered because of the loss.
 

pablovi

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2012
Posts:
6,445
Liked Posts:
2,044
Location:
México city
You don't understand football. Max coverage isn't a thing, and if it is a thing it's a soft zone. Also who the fuck told you that you can't play the same way when a team 'needs to score?'

Any idiot knows you blitz the shit out of young QB. If your CB does his job and doesn't blow that coverage, it's likely a different outcome.
For fuck say! You are saying it yourself! It’s Vildor! Of course he won’t get the job done! You now that, I know that, Desai should fucking know that!

And no, you don’t call the same scheme when a team need to score a TD.
He should have used Cover 3 or Cover 2, at tu e very least, not Cover 1.
 

Wild_x_Card

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,777
Liked Posts:
13,786
For fuck say! You are saying it yourself! It’s Vildor! Of course he won’t get the job done! You now that, I know that, Desai should fucking know that!

And no, you don’t call the same scheme when a team need to score a TD.
He should have used Cover 3 or Cover 2, at tu e very least, not Cover 1.
You don't think the Defensive coordinator knows vildor is a liability? LMAO. Clearly the bears have no one, not a single soul better on the roster or he wouldn't be out there.
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,033
Liked Posts:
12,358
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
For fuck say! You are saying it yourself! It’s Vildor! Of course he won’t get the job done! You now that, I know that, Desai should fucking know that!

And no, you don’t call the same scheme when a team need to score a TD.
He should have used Cover 3 or Cover 2, at tu e very least, not Cover 1.
lolwut

You can't call a game assuming that a player will follow the wrong receiver or give an outside corner help on ever play or even on both sides of a route.

Who says you don't call the same scheme when a team needs to score a TD? The fuck does that even mean?
 

pablovi

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2012
Posts:
6,445
Liked Posts:
2,044
Location:
México city
You don't think the Defensive coordinator knows vildor is a liability? LMAO. Clearly the bears have no one, not a single soul better on the roster or he wouldn't be out there.
Then you call for something different! And don’t call for an all out blitz with a single guy helping Vildor in man coverage.
 

Wild_x_Card

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,777
Liked Posts:
13,786
The other MAJOR issue no one is talking about is the major gap in time of possession. The defense was wiped half way through the 3rd quarter.
 

Top