HansGruber
INFIDEL
- Joined:
- Apr 27, 2013
- Posts:
- 8,256
- Liked Posts:
- 6,646
- Location:
- The Roof
I still remember watching him get his knee folded the wrong way in college,I really wanted him on the bears...he was a beast
Ogletree definitely.....he lost his job because he doesn't fit the scheme of new DC and Parsons pick....he hasn't played much....but yeah coming off 154 tackles and being an All Pro/Pro Bowler the year b4 means he is washed at 26 lolWho's he an upgrade over, Roquan? Ogletree? LMAO knock it off
Watch Cowboy games. He didnt look shitty to me
He's slow and target practice when he's on the field in pass plays and teams know it so they attack it. Like Danny T or Buster Skrine. He had an outstanding 2018 but kind of fell off after.Why did he get cut?? Seems like he’s been rather solid, if not above that
I just saw that. Forget Jaylon Smith. Gilmore would be a better addition.Pats have released Gilmore as well !
A drink Slow Jay fizzle.Does he have his own cereal by chance?
shows you PFF doesn't reflect reality on the field
So we're trusting PFF now?
I think this proves you can'tSo we're trusting PFF now?
Isn't he the guy that had the nerve issue in his foot that threatened his NFL career before it started?That's a shocker. He had 154 tackles last year & was 1st team probowler the year before. Never been injured. He didn't fit Dan Quinn's new scheme apparently & they drafted Parson's, but they just released him which saves them nothing against the $10m cap hit & $7.2 (before guarantee's) salary.
Ogletree definitely.....he lost his job because he doesn't fit the scheme of new DC and Parsons pick....he hasn't played much....but yeah coming off 154 tackles and being an All Pro/Pro Bowler the year b4 means he is washed at 26 lol
I actually think pff can cover the silent mistakes and assignments although they have to look at everyone to assume assignments. I think the issue is if someone is in the right place 95% of the time maybe they grade fairly well even if that other 5% leads to disastrous plays. They probably can't weight a play for how big of an issue it creates. I could definitely be wrong though.PFF can highlight oorah plays and really bad whiffs. Just looking at the TV can tell you that. It doesn't reflect on silent screw ups. Where people don't cover their lanes, etc. The crowd sourcing has little idea which play is being called so they are not going to be privy to 90% of the info that coaches are.
they use crowd sourced info. Each play is graded. The crowd sourcing doesn't have the benefit of always knowing where the person is supposed to be....even the announcers are guessing sometimes....PFF player grading is unreliable at best...the value PFF provides is pre-snap placement stats and the periphery stats like pressures, etc......those are measurable to a better accuracy.I actually think pff can cover the silent mistakes and assignments although they have to look at everyone to assume assignments. I think the issue is if someone is in the right place 95% of the time maybe they grade fairly well even if that other 5% leads to disastrous plays. They probably can't weight a play for how big of an issue it creates. I could definitely be wrong though.