www.espn.com
The Packers have been very fortunate to go from Favre for around 15-16 years to Rodgers for around 13 years. Not many organizations are lucky enough to experience great QB play for close to 30 years straight. They would have had some very poor to mediocre teams if it weren’t for those 2 QBs.
No one will out "lions" the lions
I'm legit embarrassed for you that you feel the need to share Packer fans tweets with us. You're the only one who cares what randos on twitter are saying.
I remember saying something almost identical when Bret Farve left. On the one hand, before Farve, they had some serious suckage for a very long time. when we had the '85 Bears, it really wasn't a "rivalry". They were our bitches. for the last long while it had been reversed and there are people now, like I was then that don't take the rivalry all that seriously because all we did was beat up on them. When Farve was finally leaving, I thought the tables would flip again, but then Rodgers.... They seem to have an uncanny ability to pick QBs. But then I thought the same about SF after Steve Young following up Joe Montana. Then after the 2, there was some drought. Lets hope the packers receive their drought. I just wouldn't be shocked if it wasn't much of a drought either. On the flipside, if Fields is the real deal and the packers have a decent QB again, the rivalry could be something it has rarely been. Competitive.
You are forgetting about Bart Star.. He was no slouch.
So here is the mind blower for the day. They would have to be limited to 1 playoff game victory from 2021 to 2080 to match the Lions level of ineptitude. @nc0gnet0
They didn't really pick Favre though, they found a team dumb enough to give up on him right away.
Good point.
