10veitout
Active member
- Joined:
- Mar 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,721
- Liked Posts:
- -559
Packers should have already picked up Love’s 5th year option if he is Mahomes 2.0, no?Doesn’t look like they much confidence in Jordan and don’t want to be stuck with a 20 million dollar paper weight on the books next year.
Having said that the right move is to decline the option. The odds are stacked heavily against Love to have a season that will warrant a 20 million dollar cap hit. Inexperienced WR and TE rooms, and two RBs that couldn’t do much with the same situation and a HoF QB under center. Even Rodgers didn’t become the part until his 3rd full year of starting. He also had far better weapons to work with early in his career.
We save money by NOT taking his option.
His 5th year option is 22 million, if we extend him long term, his cost will be much lower then that next season.
GB has the best RB tandem in the league, tf are you talking about? Look at Aaron Jones and AJ Dillons numbers lol. Your literally just claiming nonsense based on nothing. Per usual for Bears fans who just hate how good the Packers typically are.
Rodgers was great from his first year starting. 28 TDs to 13 INTs and a 90 something passer rating. 33 TDs to 9 INTs the year after. Once again, you are literally just claiming nonsense based on nothing lol.
Rodgers has more experienced weapons sure, but not nearly the upside. Watson, Reed, Doubs, Musgrave, Kraft etc. The Packers never has speed or athleticism like that for Rodgers.
Love also has a way better O line (Rodgers O line was atrocious), and Love also has way better RBs by far. Jones and Dillon are both better then Ryan Grant.