- Joined:
- Aug 29, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,220
- Liked Posts:
- 2,669
- Location:
- Fort Myers, FL
Some of these calls, that the refs refused to overturn, made me think they had money on the line.
I actually never understood the rule. If you're going to allow that penalty to be reviewed, then all penalties should be reviewable. If you want to review a limited subset of penalties it should be the personal foul one where players can get fined or suspended or both for
For as many times as there was a stoppage that favored your favorite team, there was a stoppage that stopped an onslaught from the opposing offense late in a game when our defense was clearly gassed for being on the field for their 40th minute.Good. There's too much stoppage.
For as many times as there was a stoppage that favored your favorite team, there was a stoppage that stopped an onslaught from the opposing offense late in a game when our defense was clearly gassed for being on the field for their 40th minute.
Hardly a head-sratcher. This was expected to be dumped and the reason was it didn't correct calls and only stopped games. If they made it more effective, the passing game would cause red flags 8 times a game. Refs need t let some things go in the passing game but under a microscope and letter of the rule, games would get tedious. It was stupid rule about flagrancy judgement and untenable to teams and fans/gamblers.