See, that’s where we disagree. I don’t see a need to draft a risk, of any kind, in the 1st. Now, if we sign a C and a RT, we no longer have a need at any position in the OL. Some have a desire to upgrade a position, okay, but, why not go pure attributes in the 2nd? The kid out of Maryland has that in spades.
Poles, albeit, it’s only 1 draft, seems to favor attributes over experience, especially when drafting OL. The kid I’d like to draft to play C is a G at UConn that we could get in 3-4. So, why take a top OL?
I’d prefer the best offensive weapon in the draft or a weapon on D. If Bijon Robinson’s smart, he’s going to do ALL the WR drills and show what he can do as a pass catcher. Brugler is the one who said he can run a full route tree. He would change the nature of how a D plays us as he can be split wide, come out of the backfield, and be, what I think is the first pure offensive weapon to come out. He’s the new breed, and we’ll have him with Fields. Can you imagine that? Fuck!!!
If not Robinson, then a pure weapon, even if he’s offball, as long as he’s fast and can blitz, he can cause a D to scheme for him. We don’t have that dude on D. So either the DE from Army or that kid from Clemson.