- Joined:
- Aug 29, 2012
- Posts:
- 20,864
- Liked Posts:
- 22,309
Who’s that?Hate to take the bait, but it's worth noting that one of those guys had the best tight end in the league and one of the best receivers in the league, not to mention the greatest modern offensive mind as his coach.
He wasn't on KCs preseason roster this year. Tua was busy underthrowing him in MiamiTyreek Hill
In 2018 he was.He wasn't on KCs preseason roster this year. Tua was busy underthrowing him in Miami
Not on the Chiefs anymoreTyreek Hill
That makes more sense haha. Thought you were maybe talking about JuJu being one of the best. You. Would have had some explaining to do on that oneIn 2018 he was.
Sorry, thought those were Mahomes' stats going into his MVP year. Didn't realize they were from this year.
Will be fun to see what happens but the other teams also have 10m or more of cap room to claim off waivers so yah.
Meh, he stood out negatively when he couldn't handle that onside kick vs Seattle.
I think Poles knew it was unlikely he would be able to land any of the top WR waiver claims, which is why he kept 7 receivers on the 53 man roster.
Ok so if no one picks him up and he ends up back on the PS does that perhaps tell you he isn't that highly regarded?
He'll be the #3 TE for the Raiders cause they have Foster Moreau (spell check) who started some games when Waller was hurt last year and played really well.Interesting that Jesper Horsted made the cut with the Raiders. They already have an all-pro TE in Waller, so I wonder how many targets Horsted will get. Is he a better receiver than any Bear TE on the roster?
Ryan Griffin is a good backup TE.Last time I checked Kyle Pitts wasn't on the Bears roster. The hope is that Kmet will improve as a receiver. But, where is the depth after Kmet? Would be nice to have a skilled TE receiver on the offense.
Excellent explanation.There was no 0 AD as we went from 1 BC to 1 AD so first millenium would be from 1 AD to 1000 AD and second millenium from 1000 AD to 2000 AD.
When saying the 80s or 90s, the fact there was no 0 AD is irrelevant as you are not counting the 80s or 90s based on what came before.
However if you asked when the 199th decade ended, it would be at the end of 1990 rather than 1989 as the first decade was 1 AD to 10 AD.