Should the Bears have been in Josh Gordon?

Should the Bears have claimed Josh Gordon

  • No - Too many WR as it is

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • No - Headcase/distraction

    Votes: 7 50.0%
  • Yes

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • Total voters
    14

DanTown

Well-known member
2,446
510
70
Simple question. I hope this doesn't turn into a Mitch bash but just a conversation to be had since the Bears passed on him in waivers and he's now a Seahawk.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
19,748
8,102
85
Simple question. I hope this doesn't turn into a Mitch bash but just a conversation to be had since the Bears passed on him in waivers and he's now a Seahawk.
I kept reading he could be getting suspended again. I guess the Seahawks think not
 

HawkBear

CCS Donator
Donator
17,723
14,645
85
My favorite teams
Chicago Cubs Chicago Bulls Chicago Bears Iowa Hawkeyes
No reason to sign him. Plenty of WRs as it is that we don't use.
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
12,159
4,424
75
No but maybe he can hook Trubisky up with some weed and calm the spazz the hell out. It's always nice to have more quality WRs but this is guy who you'll never know if he'll be on the field or not. At the end of the day, they need a guy who can get the ball to the receivers.

Cutler during his last years had the best WR duo in the NFL. The best this team has ever had and it literally made no difference. Can't fix stupid. Can't fix mechanics. Can't fix bad QBs, period.

Need a QB and a TE.
 

94c4lt1

CCS Donator
Donator
3,716
1,209
70
Gordon seems to only play for a few weeks at a time before having something which prevents him from building on any continunity. He's talented, undoubtedly, but unreliable. This team doesn't need another diversion from addressing their faults. Hard pass.
 



Top