FozzyBear
Token CCS Minority
- Joined:
- Apr 22, 2021
- Posts:
- 5,454
- Liked Posts:
- 3,331
- Location:
- Fozzie Land, Muppet City, USA
Mack netted 2 firsts when he was traded at Chubb's stage of career.
When Chubb is 31 he will not net a first if traded.
Pretty simple.
Sorry, you asked why and got a lots of unsatisfied answers and now you come so to us?Oh so the goal post is moved and now its about the age.
I mean the great reggie white played unitl he was like 39, right?
Macks got a good 8 years left if he wants.
PLus old ass Von Miller signed a 6 year 120 mil deal at the age of 33.. since he was too old it was a short term/discounted deal...
Age is always part of the equation when discussing compensation. It is across all sports and pretty much has always been.Oh so the goal post is moved and now its about the age.
I mean the great reggie white played unitl he was like 39, right?
Macks got a good 8 years left if he wants.
PLus old ass Von Miller signed a 6 year 120 mil deal at the age of 33.. since he was too old it was a short term/discounted deal...
So then why are you complaining that he only got a 2nd round pick four years later at the end of his peak window?Mack got 2, because it was Pace.. member.. trade value would be a lil off..
Bradley Chubb didn't play for the Browns.Also, other GM new that we wanted to sell Mack as Browns knew that Miami wants Chubb.
Supply and demand...
So then why are you complaining that he only got a 2nd round pick four years later at the end of his peak window?
Seems like that undermines your point to downplay how good he was four years ago.
Who was offering a 1st for Mack?
Age, contract, injury, reduced production. Lots of factors led to him only netting a 2nd round pick. or... POLES GOT FLEECED!
One thing I have noticed is that the Bears never fleece other teams in a trade. The Bears have gotten fleeced in trades but never the reverse. Just my observation (not talking about the Mack trade with the Chargers).
You should go back to your other alt, it was much more interesting to hear someone incessantly writing about killing himself as though he were an Australian, and then spamming the board with porn, than someone making bad points about football. We have plenty of that here already.His peak window? now we all know how long a specific person is going to play and what that players peak and valleys are 8 years from now.
Nah, if I was around under another ALT, I would have said 2 1st were too much. Even though I liked Mack. Pace would give ya 4 picks to move up 1 spot to draft a guy nobody else wanted @ 2. So Pace winning a deal in terms of value is meh. Seems Poles is following suit. Dont hate the trades Poles has made, but I question some of the values. Mack to be more specific.
Von Miller, who is older than Mack got more as a rental player.
You should go back to your other alt, it was much more interesting to hear someone incessantly writing about killing himself as though he were an Australian, and then spamming the board with porn, than someone making bad points about football. We have plenty of that here already.
I think most GMs assume that players begin to decline in their early 30s at EDGE. Of course not all do, but obviously when you trade for someone you're not assuming they will be a productive player at 35 even though a handful of guys still are. You are playing odds in an uncertain future, and the odds are much worse that a guy will be productive 32-35 than 27-31.
Von Miller cost $0. And Mack was coming off an injury.