- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 57,904
- Liked Posts:
- 37,876
It's a Higgins thread, my guy. And the comment YOU quoted of mine was about what could happen to Claypool in relation to a Higgins trade. And I have NEVER ONCE suggested for the Bears to work out a deal with Claypool. Like I said, you're missing the point and arguing shit that nobody said.
This is what you said.
Secondly, it is relevant because that's why you can't sign him now, if you wanted to.
This is what I said was a moot point. You just said you aren't advocating signing him now and I said there is no reason for the Bears or him to want to sign now so I was just saying this is a moot point because no one has any interest in extending him now.
That is a far cry from this thread because there are reports that Higgins may be traded and how likely that is completely up for speculation. By contrast we both seem to agree that no extension is coming this offseason for Claypool so again the above point is completely moot. It has no bearing on anything.