The fumble...like I said tired of refs bullshit

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
18,405
Liked Posts:
10,622
Location:
Texas
Found this reference to fumbles:

Rule 3, section 2:

A recovery is made when a player inbounds secures possession of a loose ball after it has touched the ground.
Rule 3, section 2, article 7:

Item 2. Possession of Loose Ball. To gain possession of a loose ball that has been caught, intercepted, or recovered, a player must have complete control of the ball and have both feet or any other part of his body, other than his hands, completely on the ground inbounds, and then maintain control of the ball until he has clearly become a runner. A player becomes a runner when he is capable of avoiding or warding off impending contact of an opponent. If the player loses the ball while simultaneously touching both feet or any other part of his body to the ground, there is no possession. This rule applies in the field of play and in the end zone.

So we know what a player has to do to secure possession: have the ball, and both feet or hands OR one elbow/knee/etc. in bounds. Just like a catch, and in fact there is later information that says the same - it has to continue through a trip to the ground, aka the Calvin Johnson rule, just like a pass. This should cover your second point, in part: regardless of anything else, the ball must be possessed in bounds, so a player out of bounds would have to reestablish in bounds. A player on top of an out of bounds player could only recover the ball if parts of him are in bounds.

Now, what about the ball being out of bounds/in bounds (ie, the first scenario)?

Rule 8, section 7 (Fumbles):

If a fumble goes backward and out of bounds, the ball is next put in play at the inbounds spot by the team that was last in possession

Note that the ball is what this is discussing, in terms of being 'out of bounds' (this is important, because there are some slight differences in what counts for ball vs. person). (The rule about 'forward' is similar.) So we go back to Rule 3, Section 21 to look at whether a ball is in bounds or out of bounds:

Item 2. Loose Ball. A loose ball is out of bounds when it touches a boundary line or anything that is on or outside such line, including a player, an official, or a pylon.

A loose ball is out of bounds when it touches a player who is out of bounds. That means that in the first scenario, that ball instantly is out of bounds - it has touched a player out of bounds. It doesn't matter that it's the offensive player.

However, if the ball was determined to be in possession of the defensive player, the rule is different:

Item 1. Ball in Player Possession. A ball that is in player possession is out of bounds when the runner is out of bounds, or when the ball touches a boundary line or anything that is on or outside such line, except another player or an official.
So if the ball is not yet recovered (per 3-2-7), the touching of the offensive player is sufficient to make it out of bounds. If the ball is recovered per 3-2-7, then touching the offensive player is irrelevant
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
18,405
Liked Posts:
10,622
Location:
Texas
End of story...he touched the ball while out of bounds and prior to it hitting pylon
 

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie
Joined:
Apr 25, 2014
Posts:
10,508
Liked Posts:
11,932
Location:
Tennessee
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nashville Predators
  1. ETSU Buccaneers
  2. Tennessee Volunteers
For the 2nd time in back to back games, Fox has laid down and took it like a good Goodell coach should. Retirement's calling his name, he'll be fly fishing this time next year.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
18,405
Liked Posts:
10,622
Location:
Texas
For the 2nd time in back to back games, Fox has laid down and took it like a good Goodell coach should. Retirement's calling his name, he'll be fly fishing this time next year.

Lets hope
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
18,405
Liked Posts:
10,622
Location:
Texas
Mods can u merge this thread with the cunningham fumble thread...I should have put it on there. Sorry
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,382
Liked Posts:
23,660
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Found this reference to fumbles:

Rule 3, section 2:

A recovery is made when a player inbounds secures possession of a loose ball after it has touched the ground.
Rule 3, section 2, article 7:

Item 2. Possession of Loose Ball. To gain possession of a loose ball that has been caught, intercepted, or recovered, a player must have complete control of the ball and have both feet or any other part of his body, other than his hands, completely on the ground inbounds, and then maintain control of the ball until he has clearly become a runner. A player becomes a runner when he is capable of avoiding or warding off impending contact of an opponent. If the player loses the ball while simultaneously touching both feet or any other part of his body to the ground, there is no possession. This rule applies in the field of play and in the end zone.

So we know what a player has to do to secure possession: have the ball, and both feet or hands OR one elbow/knee/etc. in bounds. Just like a catch, and in fact there is later information that says the same - it has to continue through a trip to the ground, aka the Calvin Johnson rule, just like a pass. This should cover your second point, in part: regardless of anything else, the ball must be possessed in bounds, so a player out of bounds would have to reestablish in bounds. A player on top of an out of bounds player could only recover the ball if parts of him are in bounds.

Now, what about the ball being out of bounds/in bounds (ie, the first scenario)?

Rule 8, section 7 (Fumbles):

If a fumble goes backward and out of bounds, the ball is next put in play at the inbounds spot by the team that was last in possession

Note that the ball is what this is discussing, in terms of being 'out of bounds' (this is important, because there are some slight differences in what counts for ball vs. person). (The rule about 'forward' is similar.) So we go back to Rule 3, Section 21 to look at whether a ball is in bounds or out of bounds:

Item 2. Loose Ball. A loose ball is out of bounds when it touches a boundary line or anything that is on or outside such line, including a player, an official, or a pylon.

A loose ball is out of bounds when it touches a player who is out of bounds. That means that in the first scenario, that ball instantly is out of bounds - it has touched a player out of bounds. It doesn't matter that it's the offensive player.

However, if the ball was determined to be in possession of the defensive player, the rule is different:

Item 1. Ball in Player Possession. A ball that is in player possession is out of bounds when the runner is out of bounds, or when the ball touches a boundary line or anything that is on or outside such line, except another player or an official.
So if the ball is not yet recovered (per 3-2-7), the touching of the offensive player is sufficient to make it out of bounds. If the ball is recovered per 3-2-7, then touching the offensive player is irrelevant

That's an older version. The new version is more vague but may have the same meaning though it really doesn't matter. He didn't touch the ball between losing it at the one and it hitting the pylon. Here's the thing. It wasn't an overturned call. It was a flag for ball placement where they can use their best judgement as opposed to needing indisputable proof to overturn. This is why it was such a dumb challenge. Ball was loosed at the end of the play. Team is told not to stretch and risk losing the ball yet Fox effectively made the same mistake by throwing the flag.
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,382
Liked Posts:
23,660
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Pretty sure his right hand hit the ball

That's just it. It's a judgement call and the refs were pretty sure he didn't, as am I. Once it's a fumble, they have to know he touched it to call it dead and there is no 'proof' of that. Once you lose possession, it's not grandfathered. the refs need to 'see' or 'know' that you touched it and the ball showed no change in momentum until it touched the pylon.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
18,405
Liked Posts:
10,622
Location:
Texas
That's just it. It's a judgement call and the refs were pretty sure he didn't, as am I. Once it's a fumble, they have to know he touched it to call it dead and there is no 'proof' of that. Once you lose possession, it's not grandfathered. the refs need to 'see' or 'know' that you touched it and the ball showed no change in momentum until it touched the pylon.

Refs on field called him down. If there is no evidence then how can u say he dudnt touch it...also his right hand does touch ball as he is out
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,382
Liked Posts:
23,660
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Doesn't. Call wasn't overturned. Placement flag.
 

Colonel_Buendia

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 14, 2012
Posts:
2,121
Liked Posts:
1,286
Location:
Hotlanta
For the 2nd time in back to back games, Fox has laid down and took it like a good Goodell coach should. Retirement's calling his name, he'll be fly fishing this time next year.

isn't it kind of cold for fly fishing right now?
 

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
33,376
Liked Posts:
27,842
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
Doesn't. Call wasn't overturned. Placement flag.

The call was overturned, that's why the Bears didn't lose a timeout.
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,382
Liked Posts:
23,660
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Well ya but it was because the placement changed, not because of the turnover. Still follows red flag rules.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
34,016
Liked Posts:
-955
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
For the 2nd time in back to back games, Fox has laid down and took it like a good Goodell coach should. Retirement's calling his name, he'll be fly fishing this time next year.

We need him to be fly fishing this time tomorrow.
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
You're tired of the refs now?

Well shame so many that feel that way were so mad about the replacement refs and made the union of Refs win out to not have to be more full time accountable and make ruling more completely understood by refs.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
18,405
Liked Posts:
10,622
Location:
Texas
You're tired of the refs now?

Well shame so many that feel that way were so mad about the replacement refs and made the union of Refs win out to not have to be more full time accountable and make ruling more completely understood by refs.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Im tired of the inconsistency and bs week by week...its wearing on me. The game is almost becoming unwatchable...like the NBA has already done, with the pussification of rules. Just sad in one game you are calling two different games.
 

Myk

85in25
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
11,180
Liked Posts:
4,497
That's just it. It's a judgement call and the refs were pretty sure he didn't, as am I. Once it's a fumble, they have to know he touched it to call it dead and there is no 'proof' of that. Once you lose possession, it's not grandfathered. the refs need to 'see' or 'know' that you touched it and the ball showed no change in momentum until it touched the pylon.

It's never a judgement call. INDISPUTABLE evidence to change the call on the field. The call on the field was he was out of bounds, along with the ball. The ball sure did hit the pylon with a lot of force for not being touched for 1-2 yards.
 

Top