I would agree with you except that we are the old guys with a three cup trio.
I'll take old and weird and short and less games and see what happens?! This might be a better chance for Hawks than normal, except that they have to beat the best first.
I say hell yeah! Lets get the Lightning toe to toe first and settle some past shit. A 50 game Keith>80 game Keith.
Its our advantage being small and old.
Bruh....Bolts would/will savage us. Our roster, speed, skill, and size are inferior to theirs, whether 1 game, 50, or 80. Fact.
Does not mean we are trending well, just gots to give this some time with realistic expectations and timeline.
Im with you tater but if they are still in playoff chase im not sure they move them. They are a little worried about filling the UC next year making playoffs might help that. Just my 2 centsThere's guys that have expiring contracts to consider trading. Janmark, Sodeberg, Walmark (I think).
Any former hawks out there available.Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman gave his perspective on the situation for the Blackhawks on the most recent Blackhawks Talk Podcast.www.bleachernation.com
As far as the Blackhawks are concerned, Friedman said the biggest question facing the team (with their $20M+ in cap space) is what the sweetener be for Chicago in a deal where they are taking on either a bad contract or dead money: “Stan Bowman isn’t going to do that for free,” Friedman said. “He’s going to ask for a decent prospect or a good pick.”