Would You Have Rather Cut Fuller or Jackson (all things being equal)?

Would You Have Rather Cut Fuller or Jackson (all things being equal)?

  • Jackson

    Votes: 26 63.4%
  • Fuller

    Votes: 15 36.6%

  • Total voters
    41

Sculpt

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
8,582
Liked Posts:
2,942
If we were to assume cutting Fuller or Jackson was approximately the same in 'dead cap savings', which would you have rather cut?

I think Fuller is more valuable to winning in the next year or two than Jackson, based on last year's performances.

I'm not an expert at determining 'dead cap', but looking at spotrac.com, cutting Eddie Jackson is $18.6mil, where I believe I read Fuller was $20mil with Bears saving a mere $11mil. I would have suggested Pace find someway to keep Fuller (and Jackson) but he didn't. The rest of Jackson's contract might be attractive if he plays as he did in years prior to 2020, but have my doubts that will happen. So the choice between the two is interesting.
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,857
Liked Posts:
10,180
both are valuable. the whole defense took a step back under Pagano. I would've probably leaned towards dumping Jackson though, but I'm not a salary cap nerd, I don't really care about shit that professionals have to handle.

the Dalton signing shouldn't have happened. I cited Pace blowing his load on defensive contracts in the other thread, but he did the same with Foles. you already had him, you're stuck with him. no further assets should've been put towards quarterback unless you're drafting someone. (which either Foles or Dalton could be dealt for something, I think Dalton carries enough street cred that a QB needy team would jump on that)

at this juncture it certainly appears that Pace is fucking up more to cover up for previous fuck ups. LOL
 

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie
Joined:
Apr 25, 2014
Posts:
10,515
Liked Posts:
11,953
Location:
Tennessee
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nashville Predators
  1. ETSU Buccaneers
  2. Tennessee Volunteers
More talent in the safety pool than CB. So cut Jackson.
 

Toast88

Well-known member
Joined:
May 10, 2014
Posts:
12,819
Liked Posts:
12,991
Fuller.

Jackson is still very young and could round out to be one of the great safeties in the game (although I don’t personally advocate paying a safety that much). Jackson’s much more likely to regain his previous performance.

Fuller’s best days are **definitely** behind him. He’ll soon be on the wrong side of 30, and there’s more wear-and-tear on corners than safeties.

I’m not letting a corner who’s 30+ years old be one of the highest paid players on my team, unless he’s just an interception-machine lockdown corner who changes the game.
 

Aesopian

Hooters Waitress
Joined:
Jan 6, 2015
Posts:
16,283
Liked Posts:
9,233
Location:
Jupiter
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Safety is easier to find yet Bears were stuck with Conte/Wright forever
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,580
Liked Posts:
17,367
Jackson. 1000%

He's the worst contract on this team. Yes, worse than robert quinn.
 

discplayer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 30, 2012
Posts:
1,304
Liked Posts:
689
Location:
Atlanta
Jackson avoids contact.
And how!! It’s like he’s allergic to it! Unless he’s creating turnovers, his disdain for tackling makes him not only a liability, it makes him virtually worthless to the D.
 

Payton!34

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,518
Liked Posts:
1,234
Just statistics, fuller is involved in many more plays than Jackson. Don’t see the need to pay through the nose for a safety the second or least important position on defense
 

HearshotKDS

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 9, 2012
Posts:
6,084
Liked Posts:
6,535
Location:
Lake Forest
Jackson - paying huge money for a S in today’s NFL is like paying huge money for a NT or RB - they better be generational talent otherwise it’s a poor ROI.
 
Top