Hampton fingers
New member
- Joined:
- May 3, 2019
- Posts:
- 150
- Liked Posts:
- -116
Personal meaning as a person.You literally just laid out your personal agenda against @bearmick
Personal meaning as a person.You literally just laid out your personal agenda against @bearmick
The warden sounds more like the shoopster. Isn’t that what you guys came up with?Hampton =Wardon
Are you going to eat the crow about the crow @gpphat has provided you, or are you going to continue to dodge like a bitch?The warden sounds more like the shoopster. Isn’t that what you guys came up with?
Also, I'd like to point out that I did indeed give constructive feedback when @Hampton fingers spent his first 10 posts bitching about stuff @bearmick said over 8 months ago, I told him to post less. Considering all he was doing was bitching, and no one likes a bitch, I'd say that was awesome advice.
To each their own I guess.
Personal meaning as a person.
Bearmick is a great poster, but right now he is blinded by his obsession for Watson that he can’t even make fair analysts for Trubisky.
It goes both ways man. Everyone should have a voice, but it’s a discussion board to. If you say a player sucks you better be able to back it up sum. If you cant then accept it and so should the crew. But that’s not happening.
When I expressed my thoughts on the forum, I stated why, yet there was no productive feedback, but instead I was mobbed by the crew.
And now you come on with a speech like a politician who really doesn’t care about the quality of the forums at all, it’s just an ego trip with you.
Prove me wrong.
Kaepernick was a rookie in 2011. In 2012 bearmick proclaimed that Kaepernick would be the best for the next 10 years or something like that. In 2019 or seven years later someone joins a message board and calls him out for it? Doesn't seem possible.
it was an agenda but not a personal one, as in coming after him as a person.You first few posts on this forum was going after @bearmick ...but please tell us again how you don't have a personal agenda against him
Why aren't you eating crow? Is that the kind of e-man you are?it was an agenda but not a personal one, as in coming after him as a person.
If that chaps you that’s your problem. It’s not a private membership here it’s a discussion board.
Why aren't you eating crow? Is that the kind of e-man you are?
Yeah, that’s when the gig got old and Trubiskys stock was pointed up and Whatson was leveling out.Good lord, i haven't mentioned Watson since about the middle of last season. I couldn't give two shits about Watson. You are the only one with the obsession here.
Funny, you guys want me to eat crow but nobody else does here.This is his MO...he makes some statement then gets called out about how wrong he is and then he ghosts the conversation
He literally linked you to a post of Bearmick eating crow, after you said he never did... Now you've up'd the ante and want EVERYONE to eat crow? wtf is wrong with you?Funny, you guys want me to eat crow but nobody else does here.
Funny, you guys want me to eat crow but nobody else does here.
Haven’t seen it yet, take a laxativeHe literally linked you to a post of Bearmick eating crow... wtf is wrong with you?
Haven’t seen it yet, take a laxative
Bearmick is a great poster, but right now he is blinded by his obsession for Watson that he can’t even make fair analysts for Trubisky.
He also won’t eat crow when he’s wrong, but when he’s right he needs to be crowned. IDK
From stalking remarks to everything else he uses to avoid the questions is lame.
Like I said I don’t have a personal agenda against anyone here. It’s all post related.