Newskoolbulls
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 2,897
- Liked Posts:
- 6
- Location:
- Bullspodcasters>Any other bulls board
Nasir, Philly: How serious are the Bulls about drafting Hansbrough, especially at 16? Why not try to trade up for Blair? Or take a player of a higher ceiling in Clark or Mullens?
Chad Ford: He's their type of player and I think teams were impressed with his size (6-10 in shoes) at the combine. He was also decent in the athletic testing. He had a max 34 inch vertical. Benched 185 pounds 18 times. And his lane agility and sprint drills were a little above average for a big man. In other words, he's bigger and more athletic than we gave him credit for at UNC. Combine that with the obvious production and he looks like a better prospect. As for Blair and Clark, they probably won't be there at 16. Mullens is a BIG project. He's a few years away from helping anyone.
http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=26749
I am really opening up to the idea of drafting him, however I hope other teams dont start taking notice. He is def. a Pax type pf player.
Chad Ford: He's their type of player and I think teams were impressed with his size (6-10 in shoes) at the combine. He was also decent in the athletic testing. He had a max 34 inch vertical. Benched 185 pounds 18 times. And his lane agility and sprint drills were a little above average for a big man. In other words, he's bigger and more athletic than we gave him credit for at UNC. Combine that with the obvious production and he looks like a better prospect. As for Blair and Clark, they probably won't be there at 16. Mullens is a BIG project. He's a few years away from helping anyone.
http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=26749
I am really opening up to the idea of drafting him, however I hope other teams dont start taking notice. He is def. a Pax type pf player.