I still am missing the point. Adding the word "also" doesn't change anything. I wasn't upset at your poor grammar, I was disagreeing with your statement that Austin Collie played a "vital" role in Manning's success. He did NOT play a "vital" role in Manning's success. Peyton Manning threw for 72000 yards and 540 TDs...Collie accounted for less than 3% of that total, and I would argue that any number of other WRs could have stepped in and equaled Collie's production.
Nope. Wrong again. I said Wayne was an above average WR without Manning, but he was an elite WR with him. Judging from production and accolades, this is pretty much a factual statement on my part.
The real goal is to get you to format your posts so that they are readable.
On Austin Collie.....u originally brought up he and Garcon "exploded" when Gonzalez went down...that's where all this comes from. So rather than me post the exact quotes, u can go back and read what was exactly what was said and how it got us to point.
No it wasn't "bad grammar", the statement spoke to your "explosion" post. So I modified my response to exact a better understanding.
On Wayne, my point was even with 3 slug Qb's the guy almost reached 1000 yds. So IMO, that's an elite wr's at work even with
low level QB's.
In other words, ( I'm being
hypothetical here).... it's like me giving u a good race car and crew and ya win the Indy500 3 str8 yrs. in a row. Then in the 4th yr. I give ya a Ford Pito and some how u finish 3rd place....that to me, must mean u are an "elite driver" with elite driving skills.
YES....I get it Wayne would have exceeding those #'s with a better Qb i.e. Manning.
In relation to this thread my thoughts on Manning's career can
be found in post
#84
Did u wanna do the thumbs down on this to?
