- Joined:
- Jun 25, 2010
- Posts:
- 39,829
- Liked Posts:
- 29,961
Here's what they had to say about him:
What two games were his better ones? I figure probably 2010 against the Eagles might be one.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4
Here's what they had to say about him:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/jay-cu...ng-chicago-bears-comeback-194100866--nfl.html
Wow... this guy seems familiar. I think he is on this board somewhere...
Here's what they had to say about him:
Its already annoying me. Bengal pregame, the Chicago-based "experts" were giving the Bears a big edge at QB, saying that Cutler is way better than Dalton and, as usual, claiming that Dalton "doesn't have the tools" that Cutler has (despite the fact that Dalton has outperformed Cutler in his career). This perception still exists after the game, in which Dalton outperformed Cutler yet again.
On the radio this morning, for reasons unknown, the sportstalk guys were comparing Cutler to Rich Gannon, saying the Cutler should have a big year because he's already had a much better NFL career than Gannon (!!!) and, again, Gannon "didn't have the tools" that Cutler has. Come on...Cutler has miles to go before reaching a Gannon-level of performance. Even his "breakout" game last Sunday was rather pedestrian.
I am amazed that the Chicago media is still operating in this time-vaccuum of 1986 and are oblivious to the fact that even average QBs in today's NFL can put up 300yard/3TD games with regularity. They also don't realize that "talentless" guys like Andy Dalton and Rich Gannon have put up numbers that are vastly superior to the dreck that Cutler has shown in his career.
I guess my point is that until Cutler consistently outperforms Andy Dalton, its premature to claim Cutler's superiority over guys like Dalton. Tools are just another word for things that don't show up on the stat sheet, like "intangibles".
Sick of cutler talk, starts thread to talk cutler.