- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 22,260
- Liked Posts:
- 17,824
- Location:
- Chicago, IL.
My favorite teams
Holy fuck you're still rambling?
Holy fuck you're still rambling?
Seriously guys Lovie and Tice just didn't have the pieces. Forte in the passing game? I mean come on that's a terrible idea. Running backs need to stick to running the ball.
I am not disputing that. But to be fair, fans in all cities are overreacting right now. For example, Philly fans were "expecting" a super bowl after ONE week of Chip Kelly's new offense. They then lost to a west coast team playing in the Eastern time zone early - hard to do.
Bear fans are happy because they see their QB on his feet, and they have to credit somebody.
My history professor used a term I haven't heard elsewhere (except from his students in relating the story): Multiple factors of causation.
The Bears are 2-0 for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is Emery's reconstruction of the Off Line. (Which according to PFF, has been below average!)
Disagree with this post. The first infinite post loop in message board history was created a few days ago by BearsBud...
Post #1: Has an author ever been so wrong??? He said Ditka never played in the Black & Blue Division!
Post #2: Wait...you're saying that Ditka never played in the Black & Blue Division?! That can't be right, because thats not what the author said!
Repeat times infinity
Lovie should have done better in hiring a coordinator for the offense. Someone like Trestman, but I think Lovie would have never hired someone capable of moving into his HC position, hence all the old cast offs he recruited.I don't recall reading that or hearing that anywhere.
That being said, the offense is better and I mean much better. If Lovie was here I have to assume Tice would be here, nuff said.
Well I wouldn't say the offensive talent was drained...under Angelo and Lovie it wasn't that great to begin with. I'm willing to betI would assume Martz would be considered an OC capable of moving into the HC position, considering he was a SB coach at one point.
Circular problem...one, the Bears offensive talent had drained to the point that no one really wanted the job, and its doubtful a strong OC would agree to join a staff that was annually rumored to be one step away from dismissal.
Once again, Bushrod gets a penalty a little over once ever 3 games, Garza, once every 4 games, and Slauson once ever 8 games. If we go by snaps, Bushrod is once every 188 snaps, Garza once every 268 snaps and Slauson once every 417 snaps. The Bears are at 131 snaps this year.
What is hard to understand? Based on their historical averages, none of them should have committed a false start yet. I repeat, none of them should have committed a false start. Bushrod has 57 more snaps to go, Garza, 137 more snaps and Slauson a whopping 286 more snaps. So 3 out of 5 guys would not have committed a penalty based on their rate of committing such penalties lasy year. That is not surprising. That is the basic math of their historical performance.
As for the rookies, well we have no data to track it so again, there is no proof for none of this shit you guys are going on about.
Finally I asked for someone to explain why a new QB, system, or players affects the snap count. How does any of that affect them remembering the snap count that is said in the huddle?
I have a few thoughts on this. When I played football, and this held true on every level, whenever a backup player came into the game, especially if it was an OL or DL, he would invariably jump offside or false start as soon as he got in. I would assume it was in part due to unfamiliarity and/or being unsure about one's assignment...but you bring up an interesting point. Perhaps these backup players all had memory and/or hearing issues...which also explain in part why they weren't as good as the first string players.
In regards to the Bears and the affect of coaching on pre-snap penalties, I will say a couple things. First, Tice was one of my least favorite coaches of all-time, and loathed him getting "credit" for improving his OL from the worst in NFL history to merely the worst in the NFL. Tice was always shuffling around his lineups, even in training camp, having different combinations and guys playing multiple positions. When there is no continuity, there are bound to be more pre-snap penalties because guys aren't really focused on "snap counts", they are trying to remember their assignments. I thought Tice's inability to settle on a starting 5 really hurt the Bears in pre-snap penalties.
Second, Martz's system was a great source of pre-snap penalites. One, his playcall language was so slow and verbose, the Bears had to run to the LOS just to get the snap off. This would cause more pre-snap penalties as the timing of breaking the huddle, lining up, making line calls, etc. is completely off. Two, Martz did not allow for Cutler to audible, so if the formation was bad or the play was bad, it was up to Garza to make a multitude of line calls just to make the play work. Constantly changing assignments at the LOS would lead to more pre-snap penalties, because, again, players are focused on things other than snap count.
But your theory could also be true...perhaps the NFL is littered with OLs who have hearing issues.
Cadence, thinking about the new plays, Rookies trying to figure our what they're facing assignment wise for the 1st time vs D alignment, etc. Again, nothing tangible but common sense should rule.
We should be below average under the current circumstances. The league median # of false starts last year was 18. Average that out over 16 games and get back to me. Top ten teams averaged 14.5. If you're going to take the math approach, I guess you think we should average well under 8. 5 would make it likely not to have one in the1st 2 games. It's a silly concept with too small a sample size but if you want to got there, you're just digging a hole.
I'm done.
So prove it. As I said, compare rookie starting OL penalties and see if the Long and Mills have performed better or worse over the course of this year. Right now you are making a generic assumption that just because they are rookies it means they should struggle.
If Long is this once in a generation talent that people think he is and if he is an intelligent player then there is little reason for me to just blindly assume he should struggle as if it is impossible for a talented rookie OL not to commit penalties.
WTF are you talking about. Not only is Forte great at catching the ball out of the backfield, the swing pass to the RB is a staple of the WC offense, which is what the Bears are running now!Seriously guys Lovie and Tice just didn't have the pieces. Forte in the passing game? I mean come on that's a terrible idea. Running backs need to stick to running the ball.
Are those totals all pre-snap penalties???
I think if Webb, Rachel, & Carimi were still here there would be fewer pre snap penalties in 2013 than in 2012...which is kind of the whole point.
I was looking at the offensive pre-snap penalty total from 2012...the Bears had quite a few (29), but they still had less than teams like SF (32), Baltimore (33), and Seattle (39). So the logical conclusion, according to you, is that those teams in 2012 had less talented players than the 2012 Bears. Gotcha.
Are those totals all pre-snap penalties???
I think if Webb, Rachel, & Carimi were still here there would be fewer pre snap penalties in 2013 than in 2012...which is kind of the whole point.
I was looking at the offensive pre-snap penalty total from 2012...the Bears had quite a few (29), but they still had less than teams like SF (32), Baltimore (33), and Seattle (39). So the logical conclusion, according to you, is that those teams in 2012 had less talented players than the 2012 Bears. Gotcha.
Are those totals all pre-snap penalties???
I think if Webb, Rachel, & Carimi were still here there would be fewer pre snap penalties in 2013 than in 2012...which is kind of the whole point.
I was looking at the offensive pre-snap penalty total from 2012...the Bears had quite a few (29), but they still had less than teams like SF (32), Baltimore (33), and Seattle (39). So the logical conclusion, according to you, is that those teams in 2012 had less talented players than the 2012 Bears. Gotcha.
One... Who said that abiut Kyle Long? You want people to prove something, do you have any quote of someone saying such a comment.
Its reasonable to expect inexperienced people will perform inexperienced... That's the case with Long and Mills, and not just NFL wise but from slim play/low tier gimmicky play.
Fucking A on Tapatalk
I already edited my post. I defintiely recall posters anointing Kyle Long as one of the most talented rookie lineman they have seen. If you don't recall posters making such statements then fine. Am I going to look for quotes from posters. No. But then I am not going to dispute the fact that I have not provided a quote if you honestly don't remember it. That is the difference. I don't expect people to except stuff as fact if I don't feel like providing proof. All I have asked is for people to prove their statements and instead of just saying they can't or won't they just keep repeating it.
Sure, just conveniently ignore the fact Long is short on experience.
Yet you are already shifting the post of your claims.
I actually bet if a poster here said, Long is the best rookie linemen they've ever seen... They were being completely honest and likely accurate. I wouldn't expect them to have been watching other teams rookies much. That's comparing Long to a very weak rookie linemen showing for more than a decade.
Fucking A on Tapatalk