- Joined:
- Jan 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 6,721
- Liked Posts:
- 4,107
- Location:
- Chicago
Definitely can get a RB later. We need to go DEF first three rounds. I love Ha-Ha at #14 if he falls to us. Ford didn't look bad, but yeah, Bush is gone.
Just looking at where the value is in this draft I'd say draft a safety in the 2nd (Dion Bailey, Deone Bucannon or Calvin Pryor).
For RBs start looking in the 4th for one of the falling gems (Carlos Hyde, Tre Mason, or Andre Williams) or a big change of pace guy (Marion Grice, De'Anthony Thomas or Charles Sims).
IMO the 2nd round is way too early to go RB in today's NFL. There's a lot of value late.
If the Bears did decide to draft an RB in the 2nd round, Ka'Deem Carey would be a nice pick but I doubt he will be available. Tre Mason is another one.
Later round picks like Dri Archer, De'Anthony Thomas or Silas Redd would be good picks.
It's not your fathers NFL anymore. The days of a RB controlling your offense are over. However I have no probable taking a RB in the 2nd round when you don't have other GLARING needs. The Bears are not at liberty to justify a RB in the 2nd when we just fielded the worst Bears defense in the history of the franchise!
If the Bears did decide to draft an RB in the 2nd round, Ka'Deem Carey would be a nice pick but I doubt he will be available. Tre Mason is another one.
Later round picks like Dri Archer, De'Anthony Thomas or Silas Redd would be good picks.
IMO you should bring in a rookie RB every season. Round 5-7 or FA. Also you draft a QB every season until you have a a young guy in development. I don't know if Matt Blanchard is still filling that role.
Why in the world would you spend a draftpick on a RB every year, largely regarded as one of the most inconsequential positions in today's NFL? I don't know a single team in the NFL, even the terrible organizations, who have ever implemented that idea.
You should probably get an offensive and defensive lineman yearly, but besides that, it's who drops to you + BPA + team needs. Why would you take a RB every year lol.
Why in the world would you spend a draftpick on a RB every year, largely regarded as one of the most inconsequential positions in today's NFL? I don't know a single team in the NFL, even the terrible organizations, who have ever implemented that idea.
You should probably get an offensive and defensive lineman yearly, but besides that, it's who drops to you + BPA + team needs. Why would you take a RB every year lol.
Imagine how trestman would utilize Thomas. Another Darren Sproles
If you don't bring in rookie RB's (I never said it had to be a draft pick) you end up signing Michael Bush, Marion Barber, or Chester Taylor. You like that approach, I hate it. Too expensive. Plus like the OP said RB's go south in one season, you don't think it's an important position until you don't have one.
Imagine how trestman would utilize Thomas. Another Darren Sproles