HansGruber
INFIDEL
- Joined:
- Apr 27, 2013
- Posts:
- 8,259
- Liked Posts:
- 6,656
- Location:
- The Roof
Waddle and silvy and it's not even close.
Bears!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bears!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
definitely Waddle and Silvy. They aren't constantly trying to come off as pseudo-intellectuals with sticks up their asses and do not go out of their way to fins callers to ridicule. The end of the lline for me has been this Carmelo anthony thing. They have, for years, said they needed a player with the EXACT SKILLSET Melo has, and now the time is coming to where we may sign him and they are looking for excuses to be against the move. And not excuses in terms of what the Bulls have ot give, but giving BASKETBALL reasons. Basically, anyone not named Durant or LeBron is utterly worthless.
Them thinking Rose will never be the same is irrelevant (even though I peronally think he will eventually return close to form). Actually, listening today, they said they just do not have any clue. Adding a prolific scorer like Melo to this team immediately makes them dangerous. With or without Rose. They have for YEARS talked about how the Bulls need a guy who can create his own shot. Another star. Here is a golden opportunity for the EXACT type of player everyone has wanted and now they are trying to nitpick and downplay his skill. They called him inefficient, which is false. I assume they use their standard of efficiency as LeBron and Durant which is irrational and fallacious as those two are putting up ALL TIME caliber efficiency. Melo's TS is 57% which is excellent as he takes lots of 3s and FTs and makes them at a high clip. The opposing team's longest, best defender is no longer allowed to leave their man to help put pressure on Rose.The difference before was you had a healthy MVP Derrick Rose. Bernstein doesn't think Rose is going to be the same player after two season-ending major knee injuries. If he isn't, then Carmelo isn't going to be enough to make them the best team in the NBA. I don't really see the issue with his logic. Why is that not correct?
Remydat ZaidmanThis. The only time I turn the dial from 670 to 1000 is when Zaidman comes on to give his "update". Zaidman's continued employment is much like Harry Teinowitz's continued employment...its a complete mystery. Zaidman sounds literally Special person on the radio, and everyone in the Bears organization hates him, which leaves us with "updates" such as "Jay Cutler looked really good in practice today!" or "Dusty Dvorcek has had two seperated shoulders for the past three years and he didn't participate in the afternoon workout". Great stuff! But since its Zaidman, it takes him 15 minutes to communicate the three mundane 'update points'.
If I want to laugh... B&B I know Dan is a douche but I think Terry is hilarous. I think they are good entertainment... If I am wanting good reporting and better football talk... I am on 1000... with Twad. They get better guests, and I like J.D. I cant stand Zaidman.
Satellite radio.
The difference before was you had a healthy MVP Derrick Rose. Bernstein doesn't think Rose is going to be the same player after two season-ending major knee injuries. If he isn't, then Carmelo isn't going to be enough to make them the best team in the NBA. I don't really see the issue with his logic. Why is that not correct?
I can never tell if you're being serious or not, but on the off-chance that you are, any good sports talk radio to check out? Just got XM a few months back and haven't fully explored it yet.
Matt Forte drank some water during team drills todayMy favorite type of Zaidman update is when he'll "report" something like 'Julius Peppers was in a walking boot at practice today' or 'Jay Cutler had a cast on his right arm', and thats the extent of the update. No follow-up as to what happened, how serious the injury is, how long the guy will be out, etc. Its like they pay Zaidman to sit in the stands at Bears practice, then merely tell everyone what he observed. No talking to Bears players or front office people, no actual reporting, no following up on stories and getting some facts.
Just like remydaft.
Most sports talk on there is national, and rarely do any of the 5 teams do anything to spark national talk. Plus I listen opie and anthony, Ron and fez, and pearl jam radio. Can't help a lot on this. Sorry.I can never tell if you're being serious or not, but on the off-chance that you are, any good sports talk radio to check out? Just got XM a few months back and haven't fully explored it yet.