The "Sports Science" clip was complete horseshit though 2Pic. Let's examine the findings:
- "An average person, like myself, could indent the ball more, but only by less than 1mm." Umm...ok? Congrats I guess guys? Why didn't they measure how it would actually effect the applicable friction increase of an actual athlete trying to hold it?
- According to their "calculations" (they don't tell you how they figured this out) an NFL player could apply "roughly" 1.5% "more force" to the deflated balls. Again, force ≠ grip (friction), so what exactly is the point of this? And how is this force being applied? Gripped under the arm? One hand? What?
- "Now this doesn't necessarily mean that the grip is better for a quarterback since how the QB likes to grip the ball is really a matter of personal preference." Ok narrator dude...then what does it mean? Did the deflation have any effect on grip or not?
- Mass/flight time/arrival time/added mass of water. I wasn't aware anyone, ever, had claimed that the miniscule reduction in weight would help the flight in any manner...so I'm not entirely sure what the 2nd half of that video was about other than just throwing bullshit against the wall.
- "We tested balls in various conditions and with different air pressure." Again, great there buddy. What conditions? Why is the wet vs. dry friction at different pressures not brought up at all?
Look, I'm not saying it has ever had anything to do with any of their wins or really provides any sort of advantage (some pros and former pros think it does, some don't, I can't say either way since who the fuck knows what PSI the last thousand footballs I've picked up were inflated to); but facts are facts, they broke the rules and that video was full of nothing but completely useless information that had nothing to do with any of this.