- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 19,011
- Liked Posts:
- 12,374
Bears 12-4
Packers 12-4
Vikings 10-6
Lions 8-8
Packers 12-4
Vikings 10-6
Lions 8-8
Bridgewater definitely improved. thrown in to a starting role in week 4 to replace a craptastic Cassell on a team that lost its offensive focus after week 1.
He was typical mid level rookie bad the first 3 weeks, and then in games 5-16 he put up a 94 rating, 12 tds and 7 ints.
I would say for a rookie who was not intended to be thrown in coupled with the loss of peterson that is pretty damn good. Minnesotas best RB last year racked up less than 600 yards.
Compare that to staffords usual production, (outside of the crazy 2011 season) and bridgewater comes out on top.
Compare that to what many believe is Cutlers best bears season, 2011, and Bridgewater comes out on top.
Nobody is saying Bridgewater is great, and I dont even think he has to be good neccessarily (although if you look at the entire arc of the year his arrow seems to be pointing up).
We are talking about a decent Vikings defense with an exceptional OC, a 2nd year QB that has an entire offseason to learn the offense as a starter instead of being tossed in week 4, and at the very worst, a running back who will be very good and demand respect.
Minnesota was comparable if not better than chicago last year, and Minnesota was in meltdown mode in week 2 with a brand new coaching staff... but they turned out fairly respectable given the circumstances.
Functional by Bridgewater will be a massive upgrade, And a well rested peterson... the same guy that put up 2000 yards after acl surgery... means minnesota has had 2 massive upgrades in the offseason.
Green bay took a big talent hit this week, detroit is detroit, and Chicago is roughly even with Marshall leaving and Royal arriving.
Rodgers 14-2
Cutler 8-8
Forte 10-4-2
Shea 10-6
Fuller 2-5-9
Lions 7-9
Vikings 6-10
I am not high on the Vikings at all.
Bridgewater does not look like a franchise QB to me. I don't think he will ever even be as good as Cutler. Even in Week 17 at their place, we barely lost because we were almost trying to lose the game. They already lost one of their best defenders for the year. Their defense is kinda overrated anyway. Zimmer is alright but not as good as Fangio. AP being back is the best part of their team and I am not even sure about that. How do RBs do a year away from football? It is unprecedented.
The vikes were 27th on offense last year....just bad. And the backup Bears D shut them down week 17. They are this year's media darling pick like AZ was years ago and kept missing the playoffs. I think the vikes will miss it again this year
11-5 Packers
10-6 Bears
10-6 Vikings
10-6 Lions
Rodgers 14-2
Cutler 8-8
Forte 10-4-2
Shea 10-6
Fuller 2-5-9
Lions 7-9
Vikings 6-10
I am not high on the Vikings at all.
Bridgewater does not look like a franchise QB to me. I don't think he will ever even be as good as Cutler. Even in Week 17 at their place, we barely lost because we were almost trying to lose the game. They already lost one of their best defenders for the year. Their defense is kinda overrated anyway. Zimmer is alright but not as good as Fangio. AP being back is the best part of their team and I am not even sure about that. How do RBs do a year away from football? It is unprecedented.
Really vikes 10 and 6?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good point. Ricky Williams never really returned to his former self.
Yeah, but you also think that Rodgers is a big choke artist, so I think your criticism of the media should fall on deaf ears.
No....you're right...it's someone else playing qb and losing those games. These games are on film too so I knew you would have a hard time with that fact. :bowrofl:
The vikes are being pumped up and quite a bit are buying in. I'm sure you know that the vegas odds for season wins for them has went from 7 to 7.5 with a -250 on the over.
Also....how do you get criticism of the media from saying the Vikes are the media darlings? Lol good post
Can you please edit so these comments make sense to those of us that aren't drunk and stoned?
Good repsonse. I thought you would respong in a skirting way in regards to a qb named Rodgers losing those games. Also great retort on the really bright media comment you made that you got called out on.
So was Rodgers playing in those playoff choke games? A simple yes or no would do for those of us who don't want to read a paragraph of denial or excuses.