didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,358
- Liked Posts:
- 9,937
We are loaded on D with players that have backup roles that were starters in the past. If you are looking for any kind of positive sign, this is it.
We are loaded on D with players that have backup roles that were starters in the past. If you are looking for any kind of positive sign, this is it.
Stop making threads.... please lord Jesus.
You are worse than TeddyKGB.
Stop making threads.... please lord Jesus.
You are worse than TeddyKGB.
Did our back-up defense really blank every opponent? Maybe we should cut the starters
One way i look at it is a lot of these back ups are players fit for the system and the starters (McClellin, Allen, Ego, Bostic) do not but are more talented overall. Once Fox and Vic get these starters replaced with quality players in a year or two, this should be a really good D.
Also means we won't see a significant drop off when players go down during the season (minus McPhee).
I said to my buddy tonight that for the first time in maybe 20 years, Im thinking these preseason games may end up being more enjoyable than the regular season games. First time i can remember I actually watched an entire fourth preseason game from beginning to end.
One way i look at it is a lot of these back ups are players fit for the system and the starters (McClellin, Allen, Ego, Bostic) do not but are more talented overall. Once Fox and Vic get these starters replaced with quality players in a year or two, this should be a really good D.
Also means we won't see a significant drop off when players go down during the season (minus McPhee).
I said to my buddy tonight that for the first time in maybe 20 years, Im thinking these preseason games may end up being more enjoyable than the regular season games. First time i can remember I actually watched an entire fourth preseason game from beginning to end.