- Joined:
- Jun 25, 2010
- Posts:
- 39,823
- Liked Posts:
- 29,958
Not really. If you want this thread to just be "thoughts and prayers" please visit another forum.It's a load of shit.
Not really. If you want this thread to just be "thoughts and prayers" please visit another forum.It's a load of shit.
Not really. If you want this thread to just be "thoughts and prayers" please visit another forum.
Ryan wasn't a bad coach but it's easy/amazing to see how many bad coaches got hired in his era. For an NFL Head Coach to have zero idea of offensive strategy or even the playbook is pretty insane. Just a very interesting era of coaching hires.
Ryan's comments about "running the God damn ball" because he had no idea about offense reminded me of Trestman's press conferences after he was hired and hearing the huge disparity in how his comments about the defensive side of the ball sounded compared to the offensive. I still remember posting here that it was a bit concerning to hear him stumble his way through questions about the defense.
Kind of an odd way to phrase the question. To whom are you speaking? Here were my thoughts...posted mere minutes ago!
It just seems trivial/petty/rude I don't know the right word to use.. But have at it I guess.
Although they had a fierce rivalry while they were both coaches, Bill Parcells admitted years later that Buddy Ryan influenced the NFL more than even Bill Walsh. RIP Buddy.
Honestly, STFU and go away.
The trivial/petty/rude part of this thread is your presence in it. Let me know when you have the ability to a) engage in a normal conversation, b) discuss football and c) refrain from trolling in a thread involving someone passing away.
Thanks in advance!
It's almost as if you consider me not welcome to share my opinion.
46 concepts somewhat influenced the zone blitz concepts, but the zone blitz originated with Bill Arnsparger's Dolphins defenses of the 70's and 80's and predated the 46. Arnsparger would rush an OLB and drop a DE (Matheson or Bokamper) into coverage, essentially exchanging rush/coverage assignments. It became more complicated, but that was Arnsparger's original concept.
The very good Chuck Fairbanks Patriots teams of the mid-70's were among the first to use the 3-4, and what they would do is outside rush both the weakside ILB and the weakside OLB. Offenses in those days almost always lined up in some type of pro formation with one TE and 2 RBs split on each side of the QB. The problem was that you only had one RB on the weakside to pick up both blitzing LBs, and offenses took awhile to adjust their pass protection schemes.
Buddy Ryan's 46 kind of meshed these two concepts. He'd overload one side of the pass protection by having both OLBs (Wilson and Marshall) on the same side. At the same time, not every player in the 46 eight-man front would be rushing the passer. Sometimes Ryan would only rush 3 DLs and have Dent drift back into coverage. Ryan would have his back three guys (2 CBs 1 FS) play a 3 deep zone. In some ways, it was a conservative defense, but the threat of lining up in a defensive formation that had 8 players near the line of scrimmage with both OLBs on the same side of the field usually had QBs hurrying their throws regardless of blitzes.
I think it was Ryan's concept of "safe pressure" that influenced LeBeau more than anything. And Ryan's mixtures of playing zone behind blitzes was more diverse than the early Arnsparger model of merely having an OLB and a DE exchanging rush/coverage assignments.
Hard to say. In the 70's, a lot of the great coaches were defensive guys (Shula, Landry, Noll, George Allen) and the rules favored the defense. A lot of the innovations 'worked' because you could get a good enough pass rush with your four DLs, and were then free to do whatever you wanted with the back 7. I think if you looked at true defensive roots, you'd see that a lot of them can be traced back to the 1950's.
In some ways, I think the influence of Coryell and Walsh, along with the 1978 rules changes in terms of both pass protection (blockers allowed to extend their arms) and pass coverage (5-yard bump rule), forced defenses to be even more innovative in the 1980's. Buddy Ryan's and Dick LeBeau's innovations were in direct response to the passing game...how to get pressure on QBs but not sacrifice too much in pass coverage.
To answer your question, its hard to say which period was the "most innovative" for defenses. I'd say it was 1950-1958, when Tom Landry introduced the 4-3, defenses had to figure out how to stop the LA Rams and Cleveland Browns passing offenses, and one-way players became the norm.