DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
I wonder if that "longtime defensive coach" referenced in the story is Vic Fangio or some other Bears assistant.
I wonder if that "longtime defensive coach" referenced in the story is Vic Fangio or some other Bears assistant.
there will be no outrageous bidding war for Barkley....please stop the insanity.
https://theathletic.com/31067/2016/12/23/does-matt-barkley-have-what-it-takes-to-make-it-in-the-nfl/
Locked behind a paywall, but essentially Pompei spoke with 3 NFL people (anonymous of course) who think Barkley can develop into a starter.
IMO the Athletic is worth every penny. Here are more quotes from the article. I have been saying Barkley has a genuine shot at starting for the Bears since his second start this season.
I started a (Barkley is the answer thread after his second start). They changed the name of the thread to protect me from CCS terrorists.
IMO the Athletic is worth every penny. Here are more quotes from the article. I have been saying Barkley has a genuine shot at starting for the Bears since his second start this season.
I started a (Barkley is the answer thread after his second start). They changed the name of the thread to protect me from CCS terrorists.
Apologies for not clarifying I meant next season.
Me too next season, and the next 10 after that.Apologies for not clarifying I meant next season.
Was listening to Durkin on ESPN 1000 and he made an interesting point.
He said that he would be surprised if the Bears did not draft a QB really high. He said that jobs will be defined and lost by the QB position, especially coming off of the Cutler era and everyone sensitivity about the QB position.
He said they will want options and as much talent as possible at the QB position so they can point to the future.
His main point was as much as Barkley has played well there is no way you can bet your job on 6 games by Barkley.
My fear is the Bears will let him walk to a team that offers him a bigger contract, then turns out to be a very good QB. If that happens, it will be a big strike against Pace. Better hope his draft pick ends up being a better QB.
Can we really blame Pace if he doesn't want to get into a bidding war over Matt Barkley?
I think, he could make it but 'all the throws' is relative.Any player can develop into a starter, that isnt the question to me. I am more concerned if that is the guy that can bring home the Lombardi trophy.
Looking at Barkley, we see that he is a competitor and has the arm to make all the throws. The test for him next year is if he can be a better decision-maker, and if he can improve his accuracy on longer throws. He has earned the right to compete for the starting spot next year, but it would be foolish to not draft a QB with an eye on the future.
I think the appreciation between the Bear and Barkley will be mutual. He's also obviously found a system that fits and allows and even encourages him to be himself.
Exactly. Drafting a talented QB prospect high not only brings hope to the franchise but it buys Pace time. Taking 9 wins and Matt Barkley into your third season as a GM is asking to be fired.
That is the premise of what he was saying.
In week 4 of the 2017 season you can't go to bench Barkley and have nothing behind him like this season. 4-6 wins and no real future at QB would be devastating to this regime.
He said if Barkley plays well you have your QB and a potential valuable trade chip.
Was listening to Durkin on ESPN 1000 and he made an interesting point.
He said that he would be surprised if the Bears did not draft a QB really high. He said that jobs will be defined and lost by the QB position, especially coming off of the Cutler era and everyone sensitivity about the QB position.
He said they will want options and as much talent as possible at the QB position so they can point to the future.
His main point was as much as Barkley has played well there is no way you can bet your job on 6 games by Barkley.
If the Bears end up in that second bracket of talent that starts around the 5-7th pic, I would neither be surprised by a trade down nor be disappointed in one. That is assuming Pace could get, say, a mid 1st, 2nd and 3rd. The 6th for the 16th, 48th, and 80th are near identical values. If the QB values remain low, snagging one in the mid first, along with 4 more picks in the top 80 , with Pace's success with early mid round picks, that could go a long way to energizing this franchise.
Kizer QB
Tankersley CB Clemson
Maye S Florida
Leggett TE Clemson
Quincy Wilson CB Florida
That would be a strong first 3 rounds