The benches around the league are filled with guys like barkley that have some good skills and glaring faults. The same "he could get better with experience" could be said about all the second and third stringers.
The people who are hugging Barkleys nuts here- You realize that rolling ahead with him as the penciled in starter in chicago would be just as asinine as someone wanting to move forward with Kessler, Moore, or Stanton.
Barkley is Brian Hoyer when the game is tight, yet he makes mistakes to let the other team run away with the score... and then people lionize him because he pads his numbers in garbage time.
his 3 "prolific" games were-
Vs. Tennessee, where he couldn't accomplish a thing until the bears were down 27-7 in the 4th.
Vs Green Bay- where 4 consecutive turnovers turned a 10-7 lead in to a 27-10 beat down... and people want to get all squidgy when he makes up ground against one of the lesser defenses in the league trying to burn the clock?
Vs washington. 5 ints.
Looking at the splits, Hoyer is more productive across the board than Barkley is... and I dont hear anyone clamoring for Hoyer 2017.
From their own 1-20 yard line.. Hoyer, 14 of 14 for 197 yards. Barkley, 5 of 11 for 78.
From their own 21-50, Hoyer, 63 of 91 for 772 yards. Barkley, 61 of 95 for 777 yards and 4 ints. (neither one has scored tds from their own side of the field)
Their opponents 49-20, Hoyer, 43 of 66 for 384 and a td. Barkley, 40 of 67 for 533 and 2 tds, 6 ints.
Their opponents red zone, Hoyer 14 of 26 for 5 tds. Barkley, 13 of 29 for 6 tds and 2 ints.
Barkley is what he is- a 3rd string guy forced in to action that is ineffectual in close games for the most part. If you want to say He would make a great project, then lets go look for the even BETTER projects, like getting Flynn back in the league or Nick Foles.
He has done some interesting things when the other team takes their foot off the gas, but that isnt potential. That is entertainment value.