Scouts Inc. 1/20 board

run and shoot · Jan 22, 2017

Pickles said:
I didn't cover. I didn't get your post, which isn't new.

can u read? and do u know what :

oh Pickles.......I was being sarcastic, of course the Browns haven't done a damn thing......that's why this Scouts Inc is a joke

MEANS

did u notice or READ they way I set this post up to bearmick

Quote Originally Posted by bearmick View Post
Oh cool. The latest "let's see how edgy and right on I can sound by putting the QBs as low as possible" mock from another Starbucks drinking drone.

run and shoot said:
Hey dude......Scouts Inc. is actually run by former Browns director of college scouting Gary Horton. He's produced a lotta' talent for Cleveland when he was there

( I wrote the above in BLUE) and added the pic below hope u i can comprehend it

--------

and do u know what "Reply With Quote" means

do u know that when a person writes in blue they're probably being sarcastic ( ppl do this on message boards.) Now I gotta ask u.....are u just pulling my coat or being dense to the point of needing to have things explained in length ( seems I had to do this for u on another post where u came in late, making negative comments and didn't know what we were really talking about).

iueyedoc · Jan 22, 2017

run and shoot said:
do u know that when a person writes in blue they're probably being sarcastic ( ppl do this on message boards.) Now I gotta ask u.....are u just pulling my coat or being dense to the point of needing to have things explained in length ( seems I had to do this for u on another post where u came in late, making negative comments and didn't know what we were really talking about).

Know it all, know nothing.

Bearly · Jan 22, 2017

I got it the 1st time. If it was blue at the time (we use green here), I missed the sarcasm because of the source and that would be on me. The rest is silliness and getting weird.

run and shoot · Jan 22, 2017

Pickles said:
I got it the 1st time. If it was blue at the time (we use green here), I missed the sarcasm because of the source and that would be on me. The rest is silliness and getting weird.

I've seen blue on other boards. lol...no u didn't get it. Stop lying and stop trying to cover ur azz. LOL...But again whatever helps u sleep at night.
ps....u should be the last 1 to call somebody weird ( think about it)..lol

Bearly · Jan 22, 2017

Jesus man. I meant I got it the 1st time you told me your intent. Why else would I have taken responsibility and said it was on me. And you wonder why I assume the worst.

You are working hard at snatching defeat out of the hands of victory.

run and shoot · Jan 22, 2017

Pickles said:
Jesus man. I meant I got it the 1st time you told me your intent.
.

fixed

Bearly · Jan 22, 2017

run and shoot said:
fixed

You probably should be.

run and shoot · Jan 22, 2017

Pickles said:
You probably should be.

dude....keep things focused on football. If u got a problem with something pm me. Otherwise lets stay on football

Bearly · Jan 23, 2017

Hey, I even quoted you. Very football related.

BearsFan51 · Jan 23, 2017

Pickles said:
Wait, what? They should consider them at 2 but hope they last until 34? WTF? I can see why these guys a 'former' whatevers.

It's not the most same logic from Brandt but the reality of the situation may dictate it.

They both need QBs but there are teams later the draft who may think that way too who may justify value then before the second round comes around. It's not the best situation for the Bears to be in either. If the Browns 49ers and Bears pass on the top QBs and they are still available at the beginning of the second then that's likely the route those teams go leaving the Bears to try and wait on the next best option.

I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

FirstTimer · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

This is hilarious for a ton of reasons........

Adipost · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

With this statement, you're like the guy at the Texas hold 'em table going all in with a 2 and a 7.

iueyedoc · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

Do you use your basic eye for NFL talent to determine that? You're either huffing the Oxyclean or the dryer in your "office" has a CO leak.

Bearly · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
It's not the most same logic from Brandt but the reality of the situation may dictate it.

They both need QBs but there are teams later the draft who may think that way too who may justify value then before the second round comes around. It's not the best situation for the Bears to be in either. If the Browns 49ers and Bears pass on the top QBs and they are still available at the beginning of the second then that's likely the route those teams go leaving the Bears to try and wait on the next best option.

I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

Wow to that last sentence and no way a GM passes on someone viable at 3 to hope he lasts until 36. If you pass on a viable choice at 3 because you see better value elsewhere, you hope a different talented but less highly regarded prospect is there at 36. Perhaps that was what the intent was but as stated, it was silly.

Bearly · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
It's not the most same logic from Brandt but the reality of the situation may dictate it.

They both need QBs but there are teams later the draft who may think that way too who may justify value then before the second round comes around. It's not the best situation for the Bears to be in either. If the Browns 49ers and Bears pass on the top QBs and they are still available at the beginning of the second then that's likely the route those teams go leaving the Bears to try and wait on the next best option.

I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

Wow to that last sentence and no way a GM passes on someone viable at 3 to hope he lasts until 36. If you pass on a viable choice at 3 because you see better value elsewhere, you hope different talented but less highly regarded prospect is there at 36. Perhaps that was what the intent was but as stated, it was silly. I don't think any GM considers taking a player an entire round early, at least on the 1st 2 days.

Bearly · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
It's not the most same logic from Brandt but the reality of the situation may dictate it.

They both need QBs but there are teams later the draft who may think that way too who may justify value then before the second round comes around. It's not the best situation for the Bears to be in either. If the Browns 49ers and Bears pass on the top QBs and they are still available at the beginning of the second then that's likely the route those teams go leaving the Bears to try and wait on the next best option.

I think Kizer is borderline undraftable given the best attribute he brings to the table is the physical traits and nothing else.

Wow to that last sentence and no way a GM passes on someone viable at 3 to hope he lasts until 36. If you pass on a viable choice at 3 because you see better value elsewhere, you hope different talented but less highly regarded prospect is there at 36. Perhaps that was what the intent was but as stated, it was silly. I don't think any GM considers taking a player an entire round early, at least on the 1st 2 days when the grade slope is so steep.

BearsFan51 · Jan 23, 2017

Pickles said:
Wow to that last sentence and no way a GM passes on someone viable at 3 to hope he lasts until 36. If you pass on a viable choice at 3 because you see better value elsewhere, you hope different talented but less highly regarded prospect is there at 36. Perhaps that was what the intent was but as stated, it was silly. I don't think any GM considers taking a player an entire round early, at least on the 1st 2 days when the grade slope is so steep.

Kizer is just a guy to me. He's a big physical dude well proportioned and well defined tall and athletic but his overall accuracy is scatter shot at best. Below 60-percent completion percentage in college is not a good sign.

Chicago Staleys · Jan 23, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
Kizer is just a guy to me. He's a big physical dude well proportioned and well defined tall and athletic but his overall accuracy is scatter shot at best. Below 60-percent completion percentage in college is not a good sign.

Sounds like a guy I know

FirstTimer · Jan 24, 2017

BearsFan51 said:
Below 60-percent completion percentage in college is not a good sign.

So the year before..when he was over 60% it was ok?

This is idiotic simple minded evaluation on your part.

Maybe evaluate the real reasons for the Compl% dip....then get back to us.

HINT: Windy and I have discussed them before.

Scouts Inc. 1/20 board

Well-known member

My favorite teams

Variant Also Negotiates

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Well-known member

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Well-known member

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Well-known member

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Well-known member

v. 2.0: Fully Modded

CCS Donator

Variant Also Negotiates

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

Well-known member

Realist

v. 2.0: Fully Modded