Smokey Robinson
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,893
- Liked Posts:
- 4,184
- Location:
- The 6ix
Personally I hope Trubs and Watson do go 1&2 and I'm really high on Trubs.
This scenario would leave Garrett for us this year and Cousins for next year. Use the rest of the draft to get offensive weapons and secondary help.
Next year at this time we could be entering the draft with a top 10ish QB, a top 5 RB, two bookend pass rushers, an improved secondary, upgraded offensive weapons and hopefully an upgrade over Massie. If Glennon fizzles as many expect you could probably add another top 10 pick to that list.
That's a lot depending on Cousins but if this scenario unfolded this way we could be ready to compete for the division in 2018.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wait, in this scenario who is the top 10 QB we enter the draft next year with..Glennon??
Yeah, you know more than they do, which is why you're able to decisively state as fact that none of these QBs will do anything in the NFL despite these career front office guys not knowing.
LOL
No he isn't. Clowney was near-identical (same size, same consensus #1 overall talent) three years ago. Von Miller a couple before that. Elite pass rushers come around every few seasons. More if you include guys like Mack who are a little behind but still elite.
Hell Clowney plays on a defense with the best defensive player in the game and still won't win anything because his team doesn't have a QB. Miller has a ring but played on a defense with two HoF pass rushers and all pro talent at every level. The Bears are nowhere near that even with Garrett.
The best-player-available draft strategy is the one general managers swear by, but they all need a quarterback they can swear by, as well.
Bearmick do me a favor, whatever team selects Watson please go to their board and become a fan of that team.
Wait, in this scenario who is the top 10 QB we enter the draft next year with..Glennon??
If QBs go 1 & 2 I think I'd be OK with who is hyped as the best player in the draft (Garrett) and waiting on a QB. Even if I was planning to take the QB who is left I'd at least consider it.
But I don't think that will happen. We will probably get the 2nd QB taken in the 2017 NFL Draft and Garrett goes #1.
Or to put it more bluntly, the BPA strategy is a generic lie that GMs say publicly to maximize the uncertainty of what their plans are. Every GMs roster is unique and so are their plans. They all target specific players for specific reasons. BPA comes into play in later rounds when the talent evens out and teams are picking what's left. Any GM of a non-elite team that isn't a lock for SB contention who says they're going into round 1 with the plan of simply taking BPA is lying,
Greg Gabriel, former Bears Exec
SF supposedly wants Watson, if Cleveland is actually dumb enough to take Trubisky at 1 then QB's could go 1,2. Would throw 1st totally off
Christ Eric Berry is sensational and Alex Smith isn't bad and Eric Berry can't overcome Smith checking down every throw in the playoffs.
San Francisco wont take QB when the QB class next year is LOADED. I think they want Sam Darnold next year, USC kid. I think they're going Fournette or DB imo
San Francisco wont take QB when the QB class next year is LOADED. I think they want Sam Darnold next year, USC kid. I think they're going Fournette or DB imo
San Francisco wont take QB when the QB class next year is LOADED. I think they want Sam Darnold next year, USC kid. I think they're going Fournette or DB imo
blah, blah, blah more smoke. GG has no insight into anything. BORING!!!
Yes, ask the team that continuously has reached for the QB position. Grossly I might add.My guess is 2 QBs go in the top 10.
Because it is the single most important fucking position on the field and no amount of 5 technique are going to cover up for the fact your QB sucks ass.
Ask the Jets.