Browns Owner Furious They Didn't Draft Trubisky

didshereallysaythat said:

Miller's report confirms FOR ME that the Browns were trying to move up and get Trubisky in the same way that King's report confirms for you that Trubisky would have been there at 3.

Click to expand...

remydat said:

Except King's report doesn't confirm that for me. It makes it more likely which the term more likely recognizes there is still uncertainty. Confirm implies a degree of certainly that simply isn't there.

Furthermore, King flat out says he thinks it is more likely Trubiksy would be there at 3. So I am not speculating about what King thinks because King states what he thinks.

By contrast you are taking something said about Haslam and then arguing it tells us something about Brown's actions. In this case not only don't you have a quote from Haslam, you most certainly have no insight to what Brown thinks.

So no you and I are not doing the same thing. I have proof King said what he said because he is the author of the article. Haslam didn't write this article nor did Miller's sources claim anything about Brown.

Click to expand...

didshereallysaythat said:

He was "promised" Trubisky.

Browns made all those phone calls looking to trade up to make it seem that they were trying to get him just to get the hopes up of the owner? I am not going to buy that conspiracy theory.

Sounds to me like you are choosing which reports you want to believe.

Click to expand...

remydat said:

Except King's report doesn't confirm that for me. It makes it more likely which the term more likely recognizes there is still uncertainty. Confirm implies a degree of certainly that simply isn't there.

Furthermore, King flat out says he thinks it is more likely Trubiksy would be there at 3. So I am not speculating about what King thinks because King states what he thinks.

By contrast you are taking something said about Haslam and then arguing it tells us something about Brown's actions. In this case not only don't you have a quote from Haslam, you most certainly have no insight to what Brown thinks.

So no you and I are not doing the same thing. I have proof King said what he said because he is the author of the article. Haslam didn't write this article nor did Miller's sources claim anything about Brown.

Click to expand...

ditka4life said:

Haha, Remy thinks all the calls to the Titans and 49ers were a smokescreen by Sashi Brown to fool the owner into thinking
he could get Trubisky when Hue Jackson really wanted Mahomes??????

So Sashi Brown was only pretending to move up from number 12, just to fool his owner (4d chess).

Click to expand...

didshereallysaythat said:

I completely disagree with your way of thinking here.

Click to expand...

didshereallysaythat said:

He is cherry picking which bits of information he wants to believe. His reasons why hold no merit. Confirmation bias if you ask me..

Click to expand...

remydat said:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/confirm

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/likely

It's not my way of thinking. It's how the words are defined. Confirm generally expresses a degree of certainty that likely does not. This would be like arguing there is no difference between doubt and reasonable doubt.

It's also odd you don't seem to understand the difference between direct comments made by someone (King) vs one person alleging they heard from another person what someone was thinking and then applying it to a completely different person just because they work in the same organization.

But hey, do you bro.



Again you seem confused. I believe what King said about his his gut feeling because King himself wrote it in an article that has his name attached to it. And even then, I accept that King might be wrong because the term being used is likely.

You by contrast are taking something Jim Miller said regarding what unnamed sources said about Haslam and then applying those to Brown and saying it confirms things for you.

You sound like the kid in high school that used to believe the rumors that generally started like, "Well I heard from my cousin's girlfriend who heard from Jimmy's sister, that Freddie really likes Suzie. Frank is best friends with Freddie so Frank must like Suzie too since Freddie does." Point being your logic here is high school level.

So no I am not cherry picking. Direct testimony from King is more relevant that what amounts to hearsay which is what Miller is reporting.

Click to expand...

didshereallysaythat said:

Your post CONFIRMS that you are an idiot.

Click to expand...

remydat said:

English is hard. I get it.

Click to expand...

remydat said:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/confirm

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/likely

It's not my way of thinking. It's how the words are defined. Confirm generally expresses a degree of certainty that likely does not. This would be like arguing there is no difference between doubt and reasonable doubt.

It's also odd you don't seem to understand the difference between direct comments made by someone (King) vs one person alleging they heard from another person what someone was thinking and then applying it to a completely different person just because they work in the same organization.

But hey, do you bro.



Again you seem confused. I believe what King said about his his gut feeling because King himself wrote it in an article that has his name attached to it. And even then, I accept that King might be wrong because the term being used is likely.

You by contrast are taking something Jim Miller said regarding what unnamed sources said about Haslam and then applying those to Brown and saying it confirms things for you.

You sound like the kid in high school that used to believe the rumors that generally started like, "Well I heard from my cousin's girlfriend who heard from Jimmy's sister, that Freddie really likes Suzie. Frank is best friends with Freddie so Frank must like Suzie too since Freddie does." Point being your logic here is high school level.

So no I am not cherry picking. Direct testimony from King is more relevant that what amounts to hearsay which is what Miller is reporting.

Click to expand...

remydat said:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/confirm

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/likely

It's not my way of thinking. It's how the words are defined. Confirm generally expresses a degree of certainty that likely does not. This would be like arguing there is no difference between doubt and reasonable doubt.

It's also odd you don't seem to understand the difference between direct comments made by someone (King) vs one person alleging they heard from another person what someone was thinking and then applying it to a completely different person just because they work in the same organization.

But hey, do you bro.



Again you seem confused. I believe what King said about his his gut feeling because King himself wrote it in an article that has his name attached to it. And even then, I accept that King might be wrong because the term being used is likely.

You by contrast are taking something Jim Miller said regarding what unnamed sources said about Haslam and then applying those to Brown and saying it confirms things for you.

You sound like the kid in high school that used to believe the rumors that generally started like, "Well I heard from my cousin's girlfriend who heard from Jimmy's sister, that Freddie really likes Suzie. Frank is best friends with Freddie so Frank must like Suzie too since Freddie does." Point being your logic here is high school level.

So no I am not cherry picking. Direct testimony from King is more relevant that what amounts to hearsay which is what Miller is reporting.

Click to expand...

playthrough2001 said:

#millermustrevealsourceorheisalyingprick

Click to expand...

remydat said:

No it doesn't make him a liar. Just means I find King more credible.

Click to expand...