- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 44,549
- Liked Posts:
- 39,117
My favorite teams
Let's just deal in possibilities since your only comfortable with that.
But....The great thing about making everything a possibility is that you never get to take ownership if it goes wrong, but at the same time get to pat yourself on the back when things go right. It's an amazing debate loophole remy has used for over 6,000 posts.
Possibly.But....
do you have any proof of this?
See: BearsFan51, burfict, vontazeBut....
do you have any proof of this?
The great thing about making everything a possibility is that you never get to take ownership if it goes wrong, but at the same time get to pat yourself on the back when things go right. It's an amazing debate loophole remy has used for over 6,000 posts.
LOL at this. You had quite the argument about some stupid metric for wide receivers last offseason. I encouraged you to pursue it, and you said you didn't have the time. Imagine the possibilities if you had.Lol, take ownership? This is a message board not a job. There is no accountability here because nothing we do or say has any real consequences.
Now if you want to pay me to make predictions and hold me accountable for them them I am open to negotiate. Otherwise I am not here to make predictions. I am here to discuss things of interest. This idea that every person here needs to make a prediction or take a stand on something is delusional and absurd.
Of course you said "I think they think...". You aren't an omniscent being. You can't say for certain what the Yorks are thinking at this moment. I am doubtful that you can even say for certain what you yourself are thinking at this moment.
I think a great CCS poster would take ownership.
This is just my opinion. You are completely unable to "discuss things of interest", partly due to your inability to comprehend the postings of others, and partly due to your lack of understanding of the subject matter. In every thread I've seen you in, it always ends up as "remydat vs. The World". I don't know if you subconsciously or consciously do this, but either way, do you think thats a successful way to "discuss things of interest"? Who are you having these discussions with? It can't be anyone on CCS, because every thread you start posting in ends up the same way...you contradicting yourself 100 and the remaining 10 people in the thread all mocking you.
I think it would be better if you limited yourself to making predictions or taking stands. That might be a better posting path for you. Again, JMO.
Anybody else have vertigo?
You said that the Niners would give Harbaugh the dual GM/HC role if they thought he was a great coach. This came after a lengthy discussion in which you dismissed things such as winning games, turning franchises around, etc. as "stupid logic" to define coaching greatness.
So, by inference, if you (remydat) aren't going to define greatness by any tangible on-field events such as winning, but will also allow that a HC would be given the GM role if he was a great HC...then, you (remydat) are defining greatness in Harbaugh's case by his ability to win a power struggle.
I don't see why you are confused on this.
So when you said this, you were actually channeling the Yorks...
...and your last line of "Sorry I don't think he is" means that its not really your opinion, but its just a possibility of what the Yorks could be thinking at this moment in time.
No, this isn't like throwing stones from a glass house. I'm not claiming any superiority over you. I'm saying that the way you behave in threads isn't conducive to "discussing things of interest". The fact that you haven't caught on to this when you have witnessed it first-hand over and over again is a bit surprising. Its not about me, its about you.
Its like you do the same thing over and over, and expect to get a different result. Strange. Even a 2-year old will eventually understand "Stove...hot!".
I am content because I like to argue. A
Wait! So this entire time you've been speculating about the Yorks? That changes everything. I thought you were speculating about something completely different.
So, in sum, you don't think John Fox is a great coach, and you have no opinion on Harbaugh (which is the actual topic of the thread), but you think that the York's think that its a possibility that Harbaugh is NOT a great coach.
Makes sense!
My opinion on Harbaugh is that he hasn't proven he is a great coach but that he is a good coach.